Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc

Filing 101

MOTION for Leave to File Response to Plaintiff's Statement of Material Facts and for Rescheduling of Telephonic Argument by Impulse Marketing Group Inc. (Ivey, Floyd)

Download PDF
Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc Doc. 101 Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS Document 101 Filed 10/06/2005 1 Floyd E. Ivey Liebler, Ivey & Connor, P.S. 3 1141 N. Edison, Suite C P.O. Box 6125 4 Kennewick, WA 99336 Telephone (509) 735-3581 5 Fax (509) 735-3585 2 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendant's Motion for Authority to Respond to Plaintiff's Statement of Material Facts and For Rescheduling of Telephonic Argument - 1. LIEBLER, IVEY, CONNOR, BERRY & ST. HILAIRE Attorneys at Law P.O. Box 6125 Kennewick, Washington 99336-0125 (509) 735-3581 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) Pl a i n t i f f s ) ) vs. ) ) IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, INC., ) a Nevada Corporation, ) ) Defendants ) ___________________________________ ) IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, INC., ) ) Third-Party Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) BONNIE GORDON, JAMES S. GORDON, ) III, JONATHAN GORDON, JAMILA ) GORDON, ROBERT PRITCHETT and ) EMILY ABBEY, ) ) Third-Party Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) JAMES S. GORDON, JR., an individual residing in Benton County, Washington, NO. CV-04-5125-FVS DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR AUTHORITY TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS AND FOR RESCHEDULING OF TELEPHONIC ARGUMENT Plaintiff filed its Motion to Dismiss and in the Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff did not file a LR 56.1 Statement of Material Fact Relied Upon. Defendant has Responded to Plaintiff's Motion. Plaintiff has filed its "REPLY" and additionally has filed "LR 56.1 STATEMENT OF FACTS RELATED TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS OR FOR SUMMARY Z:\IPClient\ImpulseMarketingGroup v. Gordon\Pleadings\Plaintiff Motion for S u m m a r y Judgment\DefendantMotionTelephonicOralArgument\MotionRespondStatement MaterialFact\Defendant Mtn RespondToStatementMaterialFact.051006.wpd Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS Document 101 Filed 10/06/2005 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JUDGMENT" on September 30, 2005. Defendant moves for authority to file a Response to Plaintiff's STATEMENT OF FACTS and for the rescheduling of the Telephonic Argument set for October 12, 2005. This motion is based on LR 56.1 and Defendant's Memorandum in Support of the Motion for Authority to Respond. DATED this 6th day of October, 2005. LIEBLER, IVEY, CONNOR, BERRY & ST. HILAIRE By /s/ FLOYD E. IVEY FLOYD E. IVEY, WSBA #6888 Local Counsel for Defendant I hereby certify that on October 6, 2005, I electronically filed Defendant's Motion for Authority to Respond to Plaintiff's Statement of Material Facts and for Rescheduling Telephonic Argument with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF System which will send notification of such filing to Douglas E. McKinley, Jr., Peter J. Glantz and Sean A. Moynihan. I hereby certify that I have served the foregoing to the following non-CM/ECF participants by other means: Bonnie Gordon, Jonathan Gordon, James S. Gordon, III and Robert Prichett. I hereby certify that I have served the foregoing to the following persons who are non-CM/ECF participants named in this lawsuit, but who have not yet been served or entered an appearance in this lawsuit by other means: Emily Abbey and Jamila Gordon. S/ FLOYD E. IVEY FLOYD E. IVEY Defendant's Motion for Authority to Respond to Plaintiff's Statement of Material Facts and For Rescheduling of Telephonic Argument - 2. Z:\IPClient\ImpulseMarketingGroup v. Gordon\Pleadings\Plaintiff Motion for S u m m a r y Judgment\DefendantMotionTelephonicOralArgument\MotionRespondStatement MaterialFact\Defendant Mtn RespondToStatementMaterialFact.051006.wpd LIEBLER, IVEY, CONNOR, BERRY & ST. HILAIRE Attorneys at Law P.O. Box 6125 Kennewick, Washington 99336-0125 (509) 735-3581

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?