Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc

Filing 123

DECLARATION by Floyd E. Ivey in Support re 121 MOTION to Strike 40 First MOTION to Dismiss counterclaims and Third Party Defendants or Reschedule filed by Impulse Marketing Group Inc. (Ivey, Floyd)

Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc

Doc. 123

Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS

Document 123

Filed 10/18/2005

1

Floyd E. Ivey Liebler, Ivey & Connor, P.S. 3 1141 N. Edison, Suite C P.O. Box 6125 4 Kennewick, WA 99336 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
2 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Defendant's Motion to Shorten Time for Consideration of Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss or for Clarification - 1.
LIEBLER, IVEY, CONNOR, BERRY & ST. HILAIRE Attorneys at Law P.O. Box 6125 Kennewick, Washington 99336-0125 [phone]

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) Pl a i n t i f f s ) ) vs. ) ) IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, INC., ) a Nevada Corporation, ) ) Defendants ) ___________________________________ ) IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, INC., ) ) Third-Party Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) BONNIE GORDON, JAMES S. GORDON, ) III, JONATHAN GORDON, JAMILA ) GORDON, ROBERT PRITCHETT and ) EMILY ABBEY, ) ) Third-Party Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) JAMES S. GORDON, JR., an individual residing in Benton County, Washington, NO. CV-04-5125-FVS DECLARATION OF FLOYD E. IVEY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO RESCHEDULE OR STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

I am counsel for Defendant herein. In preparing Defendant's LR 56.1 Response to Plaintiff's Statement of Material Facts, it became apparent that the basis for many of the facts asserted to be "Material Facts" was unknown to Defendant. Defendant, without Discovery, was unable to respond to Plaintiff's asserted LR 56.1 Material Facts 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 14, 18, 19 and 20. Defendant,

Z:\IPClient\ImpulseMarketingGroup v. Gordon\Pleadings\Plaintiff Motion for S u m m a r y Judgment\DefendantsMotionReschedulePlaintiffMSJ051018\DeclarationIveyResc heduleStrikePlaintiffsMSJ.051018.wpd

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS

Document 123

Filed 10/18/2005

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

by means of initial disclosures from a prior case, was able to assert a dispute of fact of several of the asserted Material Facts. Defendant requests that discovery be allowed to be concluded preliminary to the hearing of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment.

DATED this 17th day of October, 2005. LIEBLER, IVEY, CONNOR, BERRY & ST. HILAIRE By /s/ FLOYD E. IVEY FLOYD E. IVEY, WSBA #6888 Local Counsel for Defendant I hereby certify that on October 18, 2005, I electronically filed DECLARATION OF FLOYD E. IVEY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO RESCHEDULE OR STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF System which will send notification of such filing to Douglas E. McKinley, Jr., Peter J. Glantz and Sean A. Moynihan. I hereby certify that I have served the foregoing to the following non-CM/ECF participants by other means: Bonnie Gordon, Jonathan Gordon, James S. Gordon, III and Robert Prichett. I hereby certify that I have served the foregoing to the following persons who are non-CM/ECF participants named in this lawsuit, but who have not yet been served or entered an appearance in this lawsuit by other means: Emily Abbey and Jamila Gordon. S/ FLOYD E. IVEY FLOYD E. IVEY

Z:\IPClient\ImpulseMarketingGroup v. Gordon\Pleadings\Plaintiff Motion for S u m m a r y Judgment\DefendantsMotionReschedulePlaintiffMSJ051018\DeclarationIveyResc heduleStrikePlaintiffsMSJ.051018.wpd

Defendant's Motion to Shorten Time for Consideration of Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss or for Clarification - 2.

LIEBLER, IVEY, CONNOR, BERRY & ST. HILAIRE Attorneys at Law P.O. Box 6125 Kennewick, Washington 99336-0125 [phone]