Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc
Filing
152
Minute Entry for TELEPHONIC proceedings held before Judge Fred Van Sickle : Scheduling Conference held on 11/7/2005. (Reported by: Mark Snover) (CP, Courtroom Deputy)
Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc
Doc. 152
Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS Document 152 UNITED STATES DISTRICT
Filed COURT 11/07/2005 E A ST ER N DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Case No. CV-04-5125-FVS
JAMES S. GORDON, JR., an individual residing in Benton County, Washington Plaintiff, vs. IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, INC., a Nevada Corporation, Defendant. IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, INC., Third-Party Plaintiff, vs. BONNIE GORDON, et al., Third-Party Defendants.
MINUTES DATE: 11/4/05 LOCATION: SPOKANE Telephonic Scheduling Conference
Judge Fred Van Sickle Cindy Parks Courtroom Deputy Douglas E McKinley 02 Law Clerk Floyd Ivey Sean A Moynihan Defendant's Counsel Pro Se Third-Party Defendants James Gordon, Jr. (Acting as power of attorney) Emily Abbey Robert Pritchett [ ] Open Court [ ] Chambers [x] Telecon By: Mark Snover Court Reporter
Plaintiff's Counsel
Parties' Joint Status Certificates have been reviewed by the Court. The parties have agreed to the following schedule: Discovery completion: 6/5/06 Dispositive motion deadline: 6/12/06 Proposed Pretrial Order due: 9/7/06 Trial briefs, jury instructions etc: 9/18/06
Dockets.Justia.com
Page 2
Gordon vs Impulse CV-04-5125-FVS 152 Scheduling Conf. Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS Document Filed 11/07/2005
Trial: 10/2/06 in Richland, Washington Est. Trial time: 8 days PTC 9/12/06 @ 8:30 am @ R/FVS - J/Trial 10/2/06@ R/FVS Court: Not going to move up the time frame that third-party plaintiffs would have to respond on the motion for summary judgment; not later than June 12, all motions shall be done.
Order forthcoming CO N V E N E D : 9:05 AM AD JO U R N E D : 9:40 AM TIM E: .5 HR CALENDARED [ ]
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?