Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc
Filing
221
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW; granting dft's 195 Motion to Withdraw Defendant's Motion for Orders of Default Regarding All Third Party Defendants; 142 Motion for Entry of Default is WITHDRAWN; 180 Motion for Entry of Default is WITHDRAWN. Signed by Judge Fred Van Sickle. (cc third-party defendants) (LE, Case Administrator)
Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc
Doc. 221
Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS
Document 221
Filed 11/28/2005
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
JAMES S. GORDON, JR., an individual residing in Benton County, Washington, Plaintiff, v. IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, INC.,a Nevada Corporation, Defendant. IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, INC., Third-Party Plaintiff, BONNIE GORDON, JAMES S. GORDON, III, JONATHAN GORDON, JAMILA GORDON, ROBERT PRITCHETT and EMILY ABBEY, Third-Party Defendants.
No. CV-04-5125-FVS ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW
The Court, being fully advised, now therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Defendant's Motion to Withdraw Defendant's Motion for Orders
of Default Regarding All Third Party Defendants, Ct. Rec. 195, is GRANTED. 2. Defendant's Motion for Entry of Default as to Emily Abbey
and Jamila Gordon, Ct. Rec. 180, is WITHDRAWN. 3. Defendant's Motion for Entry of Default as to Robert
Pritchett, Bonnie Gordon, James S. Gordon, III, and Jonathan Gordon,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW - 1
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS
Document 221
Filed 11/28/2005
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Ct. Rec. 142, is WITHDRAWN. IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is hereby
directed to enter this Order and furnish copies to counsel and to the pro se third-party defendants. DATED this 28th day of November, 2005. s/ Fred Van Sickle Fred Van Sickle United States District Judge
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?