Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc

Filing 227

ORDER Granting 182 Second Motion to Amend/Correct Third-Party Complaint, Granting 186 Motion to Expedite . Signed by Judge Fred Van Sickle. (SAP, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc Doc. 227 Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS Document 227 Filed 12/01/2005 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON JAMES S. GORDON, JR., an individual residing in Benton County, Washington, Plaintiff, No. CV-04-5125-FVS ORDER v. IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, INC.,a Nevada Corporation, Defendant. IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, INC., Third-Party Plaintiff, BONNIE GORDON, JAMES S. GORDON, III, JONATHAN GORDON, JAMILA GORDON, ROBERT PRITCHETT and EMILY ABBEY, Third-Party Defendants. BEFORE THE COURT is the Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff Impulse Marketing Group, Inc.'s Second Motion to Amend/Correct ThirdParty Complaint. The Court notes that the Third-Party Defendants have not yet filed their Answers to the Complaint and their Motions to Dismiss have not yet bet heard by the Court. Further, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) provides that leave to amend a complaint shall be freely given. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff Impulse Marketing Group, Accordingly, ORDER - 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS Document 227 Filed 12/01/2005 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Inc.'s Second Motion to Amend/Correct Third-Party Complaint, Ct. Rec. 182, is GRANTED. 2. Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff's Motion to Expedite, Ct. Rec. 186, is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is hereby directed to enter this Order and furnish copies to counsel and to the pro se third-party defendants. DATED this 1st day of December, 2005. s/ Fred Van Sickle Fred Van Sickle United States District Judge ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?