Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc

Filing 268

ORDER Denying 261 Motion to Expedite. Motion 256 to Compel and for Sanctions shall be noted for hearing without oral argument on 4/6/06. Motion 259 to Compel and for Sanctions shall be noted for hearing without oral argument on 4/7/06 . Signed by Judge Fred Van Sickle. (SAP, Case Administrator)

Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc

Doc. 268

Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS

Document 268

Filed 03/09/2006

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

JAMES S. GORDON, JR., an individual residing in Benton County, Washington, Plaintiff,

No. CV-04-5125-FVS ORDER

v. IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, INC.,a Nevada Corporation, Defendant. IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, INC., Third-Party Plaintiff, BONNIE GORDON, JAMES S. GORDON, III, JONATHAN GORDON, JAMILA GORDON, ROBERT PRITCHETT and EMILY ABBEY, Third-Party Defendants. BEFORE THE COURT is Third-Party Defendant Bonnie Gordon's Motion to Compel and for Sanction (Ct. Rec. 256), Third-Party Defendant Robert Pritchett's Motion to Compel and for Sanctions (Ct. Rec. 259) and Robert Pritchett's Motion to Expedite (Ct. Rec. 261). being fully advised, now therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(h), any party filing a motion The Court,

"shall also file a notice setting the time, date and place for a hearing on a motion. The date of the hearing is at least 25 days

after filing the motion if all parties' counsel are in the same city,

ORDER - 1

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS

Document 268

Filed 03/09/2006

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

or at least 31 days if counsel are not in the same city[.]"

Third-

Party Plaintiff Bonnie Gordon did not file a notice of hearing with her motion to compel and motion for sanctions. In accordance with

the Local Rules, that motion (Ct. Rec. 256) shall be noted for hearing without oral argument on April 6, 2006, unless Bonnie Gordon files a specific request for oral argument. 2. Third-Party Defendant Robert Pritchett's Motion to Expedite In light of the June 5, 2006, discovery Court determines that an emergency

(Ct. Rec. 261), is DENIED. deadline in this case, the hearing is not necessary. 3.

Third Party Defendant Robert Pritchett's Motion to Compel

and for Sanctions (Ct. Rec. 259) shall be noted for hearing on April 7, 2006, without oral argument unless Robert Pritchett files a request for oral argument. IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is hereby

directed to enter this Order and furnish copies to counsel and to the Third-Party Defendants proceeding pro se. DATED this 9th day of March, 2006. s/ Fred Van Sickle Fred Van Sickle United States District Judge

ORDER - 2