Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc

Filing 354

MOTION to Expedite Defendant's Motion for hearing of Plaintiff's Motion to Amend complaint by Oral Argument by Impulse Marketing Group Inc. (Ivey, Floyd)

Download PDF
Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc Doc. 354 Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS Document 354 Filed 04/19/2006 FLOYD E. IVEY Liebler, Ivey, Connor, Berry & St. Hilaire 2 P. O. Box 6125 Kennewick, WA 99336-0125 3 5 0 9 -7 3 5 -3 5 8 1 Attorneys for Defendant 4 Impulse Marketing Group, Inc. and Third Party Plaintiff 1 5 6 Klein, Zelman, Rothermel, & Dichter, L.L.P. By: Sean Moynihan, Esq.; Peter Glantz 485 Madison Avenue 7 New York, New York 10022 Telephone Number (212) 935-6020 8 Facsimile Number (212) 753-8101 Attorneys for Defendant 9 Impulse Marketing Group, Inc. and Third Party Plaintiff 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ROBERT SIEGEL Attorney At Law Attorney for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) Pl a i n t i f f , ) vs. ) ) IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, ) INC., ) ) Defendant ______________________________ ) ) ) IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, ) INC., ) ) Third-Party Plaintiff, vs. ) ) ) BONNIE GORDON, et al., ) ) Third-Party Defendants. JAMES S. GORDON, JR., No. CV-04-5125-FVS DEFENDANT'S EXPEDITED MOTION FOR HEARING OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT WITH ORAL ARGUMENT Plaintiff has moved to amend Plaintiff's Complaint without oral argument set for May 1, 2006. Defendant has requested, in responses, that Plaintiff's Motion to DefendantMotionOralArguPlaintiffsMotAmend - Page 1 of 3 LIEBLER, IVEY, CONNOR, BERRY & ST. HILAIRE Attorneys at Law P.O. Box 6125 Kennewick, Washington 99336-0125 (509) 735-3581 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS Document 354 Filed 04/19/2006 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Amend be set with Oral Argument. Defendant now moves to hear Plaintiff's Motion to Amend with oral argument and sets, by separate Notice, this motion for hearing without oral argument of 6:30 April 19, 2006 or as soon thereafter as the court determines. Defendant has filed a Notice of Hearing of Defendant's re-noted Motion to Compel for hearing with oral argument on May 1, 2006. Defendant now moves to Strike Defendant's setting of a Motion to Compel for May 1, 2006 and will by separate Notice set the motion for hearing with Oral Argument. DATED this 19th day of April, 2006. LIEBLER, IVEY, CONNOR, BERRY & ST. HILAIRE By s/ FLOYD E. IVEY FLOYD E. IVEY, WSBA#6888 Attorneys for Defendant 1141 N. Edison, Suite C P.O. Box 6125 Kennewick, Washington 99336 Local Counsel for Defendant Impulse Marketing Group, Inc. S/ SEAN MOYNIHAN & PETER J. GLANTZ Sean A. Moynihan & Peter J. Glantz Klein, Zelman, Rothermelh & Dichter, LLP 485 Madison Avenue, 15t Floor New York, New York 10022 (212) 935-6020 (212) 753-8101 (fax) I hereby certify that on April 19, 2006, I electronically filed DefendantMotionOralArguPlaintiffsMotAmend - Page 2 of 3 LIEBLER, IVEY, CONNOR, BERRY & ST. HILAIRE Attorneys at Law P.O. Box 6125 Kennewick, Washington 99336-0125 (509) 735-3581 Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS Document 354 Filed 04/19/2006 DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR HEARING OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT BY ORAL ARGUMENT and DEFENDANT'S MOTION 2 TO STRIKE RENOTE OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL FOR MAY 1, 2006 with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF System which will send 3 notification of such filing to Robert Siegel, Peter J. Glantz and Sean A. Moynihan. I hereby certify that I have served the foregoing to the following non-CM/ECF 4 participants by other means: Bonnie Gordon, Jonathan Gordon, James S. Gordon, III, Robert Pritchett, Jamila Gordon and Emily Abbey. 1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DefendantMotionOralArguPlaintiffsMotAmend - Page 3 of 3 LIEBLER, IVEY, CONNOR, BERRY & ST. HILAIRE S/ FLOYD E. IVEY FLOYD E. IVEY Attorneys at Law P.O. Box 6125 Kennewick, Washington 99336-0125 (509) 735-3581

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?