Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc
Filing
357
AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING ORDER Resetting Hearing on Motion 320 MOTION to Dismiss Third Party Defendants' Counterclaims: Motion Hearing reset for 5/18/2006 at 10:00 AM Telephonic Argument for 320 , before Judge Fred Van Sickle. Plaintiff Impulse Marketing Group shall initiate the call. Signed by Judge Fred Van Sickle. (SAP, Case Administrator)
Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc
Doc. 357
Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS
Document 357
Filed 05/03/2006
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
JAMES S. GORDON, JR., an individual residing in Benton County, Washington, Plaintiff,
No. CV-04-5125-FVS AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING
v. IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, INC.,a Nevada Corporation, Defendant. IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, INC., Third-Party Plaintiff, v. BONNIE GORDON, JAMES S. GORDON, III, JONATHAN GORDON, JAMILA GORDON, ROBERT PRITCHETT and EMILY ABBEY, Third-Party Defendants. The Court, being fully advised, now therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that due to the Court's criminal trial schedule, the telephonic hearing set for May 12, 2006, for ThirdParty Plaintiff Impulse Marketing Group's Motion to Dismiss ThirdParty Defendants' Counterclaims (Ct. Rec. 320) is CONTINUED to May 18, 2006, at 10:00 a.m. Counsel for the moving party, Third-Party
Plaintiff Impulse Marketing Group, shall initiate the call.
AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING - 1
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS
Document 357
Filed 05/03/2006
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
// IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is hereby
directed to enter this Order and furnish copies to counsel. DATED this 3rd day of May, 2006. s/ Fred Van Sickle Fred Van Sickle United States District Judge
AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?