Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc

Filing 366

MOTION to Expedite THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT'S AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS by Impulse Marketing Group Inc. (Ivey, Floyd)

Download PDF
Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc Doc. 366 Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS Document 366 Filed 05/12/2006 FLOYD E. IVEY Liebler, Ivey, Connor, Berry & St. Hilaire 2 P. O. Box 6125 Kennewick, WA 99336-0125 3 5 0 9 -7 3 5 -3 5 8 1 Attorneys for Defendant 4 Impulse Marketing Group, Inc. and Third Party Plaintiff 1 5 6 Klein, Zelman, Rothermel, & Dichter, L.L.P. By: Sean Moynihan, Esq.; Peter Glantz 485 Madison Avenue 7 New York, New York 10022 Telephone Number (212) 935-6020 8 Facsimile Number (212) 753-8101 Attorneys for Defendant 9 Impulse Marketing Group, Inc. and Third Party Plaintiff 10 11 Robert th Siegel J. 1325 4 Ave. Suite 940 Seattle, Wa. 98101-2509 12 Telephone: 206 624 9392 Facsimile Number 206 624 0717 13 Attorney for Plaintiff 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Motion to Dismiss Third Party Defendants' Counterclaims Page 1 of 3 LIEBLER, IVEY, CONNOR, BERRY & ST. HILAIRE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) Pl a i n t i f f , ) vs. ) ) IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, ) INC., ) ) Defendant ______________________________ ) ) ) IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, INC., ) ) Third-Party Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ) BONNIE GORDON, et al., ) ) Third-Party Defendants. ) JAMES S. GORDON, JR., No. CV-04-5125-FVS MOTION TO EXPEDITE HEARING OF THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS' AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS Motion to Expedite Noted without Oral Argument for May 12, 2006 at 6:30 p.m. WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT Attorneys at Law P.O. Box 6125 Kennewick, Washington 99336-0125 (509) 735-3581 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS Document 366 Filed 05/12/2006 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff now Moves to Expedite the hearing of Third Party Plaintiff's Motion Dismiss Third Party Defendants' Amended Counterclaims on May 18, 2006, at 10 a.m. Third Party Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Third Party Defendants' Counterclaims is set for May 18, 2006 at 10 a.m. Third Party Defendants have filed First Amended Counterclaims subsequent to the noting of the Third Party Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss. The Third Party Defendant's have revised their original counterclaims and have added one or more counterclaim. The Third Party Plaintiff asks the Court to expedite Third Party Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss the Amended Counterclaims for hearing as scheduled for the original Motion to Dismiss Third Party Defendants' Counterclaims. DATED this 12th day of May, 2006. S/FLOYD E. IVEY ______________________________ Liebler, Ivey, Conner, Berry & St. Hilaire By: Floyd E. Ivey 1141 N. Edison, Suite C P.O. Box 6125 Kennewick, Washington 99336 Local Counsel for Defendant Impulse Marketing Group, Inc. S/FLOYD E. IVEY for SEAN MOYNIHAN and PETER GLANTZ ____________________________ Sean A. Moynihan Peter J. Glantz Klein, Zelman, Rothermel & Dichter, LLP {00078056;1} 2 Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS Document 366 Filed 05/12/2006 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 485 Madison Avenue, 15th Floor New York, New York 10022 (212) 935-6020 (212) 753-8101 (fax) I hereby certify that on May 12, 2006, I electronically filed THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXPEDITE HEARING OF THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS' AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF System which will send notification of such filing to Robert J. Siegel, Peter J. Glantz and Sean A. Moynihan. I hereby certify that I have served the foregoing to the following non-CM/ECF participants by other means: Bonnie Gordon, Jonathan Gordon, James S. Gordon, III, Robert Pritchett, Emily Abbey and Jamila Gordon. S/ FLOYD E. IVEY FLOYD E. IVEY {00078056;1} 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?