Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc

Filing 378

ORDER AND NOTICE OF HEARING. Oral argument is not warranted on Third-Party Plaintiff Impulse Marketing's 320 MOTION to Dismiss Third Party Defendants' Counterclaims and 365 MOTION to Dismiss Third-Party Defendants' Amended Counterclaims. Order shall be forthcoming. Telephonic hearing set for 5/18/06 is STRICKEN. Signed by Judge Fred Van Sickle. (SAP, Case Administrator)

Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc

Doc. 378

Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS

Document 378

Filed 05/17/2006

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

JAMES S. GORDON, JR., an individual residing in Benton County, Washington, Plaintiff,

No. CV-04-5125-FVS ORDER AND NOTICE OF HEARING

v. IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, INC.,a Nevada Corporation, Defendant. IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, INC., Third-Party Plaintiff, v. BONNIE GORDON, JAMES S. GORDON, III, JONATHAN GORDON, JAMILA GORDON, ROBERT PRITCHETT and EMILY ABBEY, Third-Party Defendants. The Court, being fully advised, now therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(h)(3), the Court determines in its discretion that oral argument is not warranted on Third-Party Plaintiff Impulse Marketing's Motion to Dismiss Third-Party Defendants' Counterclaims (Ct. Rec. 320) and Motion to Dismiss Third-Party Defendants' Amended Counterclaims (Ct. Rec. 365). An Order ruling on these motions will be forthcoming.

ORDER AND NOTICE OF HEARING - 1

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS

Document 378

Filed 05/17/2006

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

The telephonic hearing scheduled for May 18, 2006, is STRICKEN. IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is hereby

directed to enter this Order and furnish copies to counsel and to those parties proceeding pro se. DATED this 17th day of May, 2006. s/ Fred Van Sickle Fred Van Sickle United States District Judge

ORDER AND NOTICE OF HEARING - 2