Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc

Filing 55

DECLARATION by Floyd E. Ivey in Support re 54 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment filed by Impulse Marketing Group Inc. (Ivey, Floyd)

Download PDF
Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc Doc. 55 Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS Document 55 Filed 09/06/2005 1 Floyd E. Ivey Liebler, Ivey & Connor, P.S. 3 1141 N. Edison, Suite C P.O. Box 6125 4 Kennewick, WA 99336 Telephone (509) 735-3581 5 Fax (509) 735-3585 2 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Declaration of Floyd E. Ivey in Support of Second Motion For Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment - 1. LIEBLER, IVEY, CONNOR, BERRY & ST. HILAIRE Attorneys at Law P.O. Box 6125 Kennewick, Washington 99336-0125 (509) 735-3581 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) Pl a i n t i f f s ) ) vs. ) ) IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, INC., ) a Nevada Corporation, ) ) Defendants ) ___________________________________ ) IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, INC., ) ) Third-Party Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) BONNIE GORDON, JAMES S. GORDON, ) III, JONATHAN GORDON, JAMILA ) GORDON, ROBERT PRITCHETT and ) EMILY ABBEY, ) ) Third-Party Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) JAMES S. GORDON, JR., an individual residing in Benton County, Washington, NO. CV-04-5125-FVS DECLARATION OF FLOYD E. IVEY SUPPORTING DEFENDANT'S SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION I am counsel for Defendant. Defendant has filed its Answer with Counter Claims and a Third-Party Complaint. Plaintiff has not filed a responsive pleading. Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Dismiss Defednant's Counterclaims and Third Party Complaint. Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss was extended by order of the court to September 7, 2005. Z:\IPClient\ImpulseMarketingGroup v. Gordon\Pleadings\Plaintiff Motion for S u m m a r y Judgment\DefendantsSecondMotionExtension.050906\Declaration.Ivey.Supportin g.Defendant.Second.Motion.Extension.Time.File.Response.050906.wpd Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS Document 55 Filed 09/06/2005 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Defendant has filed its First Amended Defendant's Answer, Counterclaims and Third-Party Complaint on September 6, 2005. Defendant requests a further extension of time to file its Response to Plaintiff's Motion to September 21, 2005 or in the alternative the Defendant requests that Plaintiff's Motin to Dismiss be stricken in light of Defendant's filing of its First Amended Defendant's Answer. DATED this 6th day of September, 2005. LIEBLER, IVEY, CONNOR, BERRY & ST. HILAIRE By /s/ FLOYD E. IVEY FLOYD E. IVEY, WSBA #6888 Local Counsel for Defendant KLEIN, ZELMAN, ROTHERMEL & DICHTER, LLP By PETER J. GLANTZ by telephone authority by /S/FLOYD E. IVEY PETER J. GLANTZ Attorneys for Defendant I hereby certify that on September 6, 2005, I electronically filed Declaration of Floyd E. Ivey in Support of Defendant's Second Motion for 17 Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF System 18 which will send notification of such filing to Douglas E. McKinley, Jr. and transmitted via internet to Peter Glantz. 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Declaration of Floyd E. Ivey in Support of Second Motion For Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment - 2. LIEBLER, IVEY, CONNOR, BERRY & ST. HILAIRE Attorneys at Law P.O. Box 6125 Kennewick, Washington 99336-0125 (509) 735-3581 S/ FLOYD E. IVEY FLOYD E. IVEY Z:\IPClient\ImpulseMarketingGroup v. Gordon\Pleadings\Plaintiff Motion for S u m m a r y Judgment\DefendantsSecondMotionExtension.050906\Declaration.Ivey.Supportin g.Defendant.Second.Motion.Extension.Time.File.Response.050906.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?