Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc

Filing 80

DECLARATION by Sean Moynihan in Support re 77 MOTION Telephonic Oral Argument on Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss and in the alternative for Terms filed by Impulse Marketing Group Inc. (Ivey, Floyd)

Download PDF
Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc Doc. 80 Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS Document 80 Filed 09/13/2005 1 Floyd E. Ivey Liebler, Ivey & Connor, P.S. 3 1141 N. Edison, Suite C P.O. Box 6125 4 Kennewick, WA 99336 Telephone (509) 735-3581 5 Fax (509) 735-3585 2 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Declaration of Sean Moynihan in Support of Defendant's Motion for Telephonic Oral Argument of Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss set for October 12, 2005 - 1. LIEBLER, IVEY, CONNOR, BERRY & ST. HILAIRE Attorneys at Law P.O. Box 6125 Kennewick, Washington 99336-0125 (509) 735-3581 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) Pl a i n t i f f s ) ) vs. ) ) IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, INC., ) a Nevada Corporation, ) ) Defendants ) ___________________________________ ) IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, INC., ) ) Third-Party Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) BONNIE GORDON, JAMES S. GORDON, ) III, JONATHAN GORDON, JAMILA ) GORDON, ROBERT PRITCHETT and ) EMILY ABBEY, ) ) Third-Party Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) JAMES S. GORDON, JR., an individual residing in Benton County, Washington, NO. CV-04-5125-FVS DECLARATION OF SEAN MOYNIHAN IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR TELEPHONIC ORAL ARGUMENT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS SET FOR OCTOBER 12, 2005 I am one of the attorneys appearing for Defendant in this matter. This firm has represented other Defendant's relative to claims by Plaintiff James S. Gordon, Jr. I have been a principal attorney in directing the Defense of this case and will present argument in support of the Defendant. In March 2005 we resisted Plaintiff's request that the Defendant's Motion to Z:\IPClient\ImpulseMarketingGroup v. Gordon\Pleadings\Plaintiff Motion for S u m m a r y Judgment\DefendantMotionTelephonicOralArgument\DeclarationOfSean.Moynih anTelephonicOralArgument.2.050913.wpd Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS Document 80 Filed 09/13/2005 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Dismiss be argued by the personal appearance of counsel before the Court. Telephonic Oral Argument did occur. The economic impact of travel expense is estimated at $1,000 including air fare on Delta from New York to Pasco of $624.28 and hotel and meals. The additional expense to the client will be approximately $3,200 per diem for litigation, for a total of $13,800 for four days of October 10 through October 13. Some of these legal expenses will be incurred with Telephonic Oral Argument thus reducing the total additional expense. DATED this 13th day of September, 2005. By /s/ SEAN MOYNIHAN Counsel for Defendant I hereby certify that on September 13, 2005, I electronically filed Declaration of Sean Moynihan on in Support of Defendant's Motion for Telephonic Oral Argument of Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Set for October 15 12, 2005 with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF System which will send notification of such filing to Douglas E. McKinley, Jr., Peter J. Glantz and Sean A. 16 Moynihan. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Declaration of Sean Moynihan in Support of Defendant's Motion for Telephonic Oral Argument of Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss set for October 12, 2005 - 2. LIEBLER, IVEY, CONNOR, BERRY & ST. HILAIRE Attorneys at Law P.O. Box 6125 Kennewick, Washington 99336-0125 (509) 735-3581 S/ FLOYD E. IVEY FLOYD E. IVEY Z:\IPClient\ImpulseMarketingGroup v. Gordon\Pleadings\Plaintiff Motion for S u m m a r y Judgment\DefendantMotionTelephonicOralArgument\DeclarationOfSean.Moynih anTelephonicOralArgument.2.050913.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?