Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc

Filing 84

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR TELEPHONIC HEARING; granting dft's 75 Motion to Expedite; granting dft's 77 Motion for Telephonic Argument; the 10/12/05 hrg on pltf's Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims & Third Party Dfts 40 and dft's Motion for Dismissal of Third-Party Dft Lew Reed 50 will be conducted via telephonic conference with counsel for dft Impulse Marketing Group to initiate the call. Signed by Judge Fred Van Sickle. (LE, Case Administrator)

Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc

Doc. 84

Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS

Document 84

Filed 09/15/2005

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

JAMES S. GORDON, JR., an individual residing in Benton County, Washington,

No. CV-04-5125-FVS ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR TELEPHONIC HEARING

Plaintiff, v. IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, INC.,a Nevada Corporation, Defendant. IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, INC., Third-Party Plaintiff, BONNIE GORDON, JAMES S. GORDON, III, JONATHAN GORDON, JAMILA GORDON, ROBERT PRITCHETT and EMILY ABBEY, Third-Party Defendants.

The Court, being fully advised, now, therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 1, which states

that the rules "shall be construed and administered to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action", Defendant's Motion for Telephonic Oral Argument, Ct. Rec. 77, is GRANTED. The October 12, 2005, hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR TELEPHONIC HEARING - 1

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS

Document 84

Filed 09/15/2005

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Dismiss Counterclaims and Third Party Defendants Under FRCP 12(b)(6) or in the Alternative For Summary Judgment Under FRCP 56 or in the Alternative To Dismiss Under FRCP 9(b), Ct. Rec. 40, and Defendant's Motion for Dismissal of Third-Party Defendant Lew Reed, Ct. Rec. 50, will be conducted via telephonic conference with all parties participating by telephone. Counsel for Defendant Impulse Marketing

Group, Inc. shall initiate the call. 2. The Defendant's Motion to Expedite, Ct. Rec. 75, is GRANTED. The District Court Executive is hereby

IT IS SO ORDERED.

directed to enter this Order and furnish copies to counsel. DATED this 15th day of September, 2005. s/ Fred Van Sickle Fred Van Sickle United States District Judge

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR TELEPHONIC HEARING - 2