Bradburn et al v. North Central Regional Library District

Filing 14

Joint MOTION to Expedite Hearing Re: Motion to Modify Case Scheduling Order by North Central Regional Library District. (Adams, Thomas)

Download PDF
Bradburn et al v. North Central Regional Library District Doc. 14 Case 2:06-cv-00327-EFS Document 14 Filed 09/13/2007 1 The Honorable Edward F. Shea Thomas D. Adams 2 3 Celeste Mountain Monroe 4 KARR TUTTLE CAMPBELL 5 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2900 Seattle, Washington 98101-3028 6 (206)223-1313 7 Attorneys for North Central Regional Library District 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SPOKANE 12 13 SARH BRADBUR, PEAR 14 15 CHERRGTON, CHAES HEINEN, and THE SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNATION, Plaintiffs, v. 16 17 18 19 20 21 NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL LIBRARY DISTRICT, ) ) ) NO. CV-06-327-EFS ) ) JOINT MOTION FOR ) HEARING ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) EXPEDITED 22 23 Defendant. 24 25 The parties move the Court to grant their Joint Motion for Expedited Hearing. The parties further request that the Court hear their Motion to Amend 26 27 28 JOINT MOTION FOR EXPEDITED HEARING - 1 CV-06-327-EFS #642220 vI /42703-001 Law Offces KARR TUTTLE CAMPBELL A Professional Service Corporation IZUI Tbird Avenue, Suite 29t)), Sea"lc, WlishiDglOD 98101-JlJ28 Telephone (206) 223-1313, Facsimile (206) 682-7100 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:06-cv-00327-EFS Document 14 Filed 09/13/2007 1 the Case Scheduling Order on September 14, 2007 without oral argument. Good cause exists for this request. 2 3 4 5 On February 27, 2007, the Court entered a scheduling order in the above- captioned case following a telephonic status conference with counseL. The parties stipulated to a modification of the case schedule and acted in reliance upon it. This stipulation was filed on June 28, 2007, however, it was never entered by the Court. 6 7 8 9 10 11 Under the operative case scheduling order entered in February 2007, the 12 13 discovery cut off is Friday, September 14, 2007. By its motion to Amend the Case Scheduling Order, the parties request the Court extend the discovery cut 14 15 off, and other critical dates primarily to allow for the completion of expert discovery. For this reason, the parties respectfully request that the Court grant their motion for expedited hearing and that it rule on their Motion to Amend the Case Schedule on Friday, September 14, 2007. 16 17 18 19 20 21 NCRL has confirmed that Plaintiffs' counsel has no objection to this Motion for Expedited Hearing. Similarly, Plaintiffs' counsel has stipulated to the dates contained in the Motion to Amend the Case Scheduling Order. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT MOTION FOR EXPEDITED HEARNG - 2 CV-06-327-EFS #642220 vI /42703-001 Lmv Offces KARR TUTTLE CAMPBELL A Professional Service Corporation 1201 Third Avenue, Suile 2900, Seattle. Washington 98101-3028 Telephone (206) 223-1313, Facsimile (206) 682-7100 Case 2:06-cv-00327-EFS Document 14 Filed 09/13/2007 1 DATED this 13th day of September, 2007. 2 3 KARR TUTTLE CAMPBELL 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Isl Thomas D. Adams Thomas D. Adams, WSBA #18470 E-mail: tadams~karruttle.com Celeste M. Monroe, WSBA #35843 E-mail: cmonroe~karruttle.com Attorney for Defendant North Central Regional Library District KARR TUTTLE CAMPBELL 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2900 Seattle, Washington 98101 Telephone: 206.223.1313 Facsimile: 206.682.7100 12 13 14 15 CERTIFICA TE OF SERVICE 16 1 hereby certify that on September 13, 2007, 1 electronically fied the foregoing with the Clerk of the 17 Court using the cM/EcF system which will send notification of such fiing to the persons listed below: 18 Duncan Manvile 19 Rafel Manvile PLLc 999 Third Ave., Ste. 1600 Seattle, W A 98104 20 21 KARR TUTTLE CAMPBELL 22 23 24 25 BY~tC Heather L. White hwhite~karruttie.com 26 27 28 JOINT MOTION FOR EXPEDITED HEARNG - 3 CV -06-327 - EFS #642220 vi /42703-001 Lmv Offces KARR TUTTLE CAMPBELL A Professional Service Corporation 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2900, Seattle, Washington 98iOi~J028 Telephone (206) 223-1313, Facsimile (206) 682-7100

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?