Grondal et al v. United States of America et al

Filing 504

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION - Judgment in favor of the Government (Federal Defendants) on its trespass counterclaim. (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.) (LTR, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the_ Eastern District of Washington FILED IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON PAUL GRONDAL, a Washington resident, Plaintiff v. MILL BAY MEMBERS ASSOCIATION, INC., et al. Jul 09, 2020 ) ) ) ) ) SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK Civil Action No. 2:09-cv-00018-RMP Defendant JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): ’ the plaintiff (name) defendant (name) interest at the rate of recover from the the amount of ), which includes prejudgment % per annum, along with costs. dollars ($ %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of ’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . ’ other: Defendants’ Motion and Memorandum Joining in the Federal Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment re Ejectment, (ECF No. 344) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 433) is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 439) is DENIED. The Government’s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment re Ejectment (ECF No. 231) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs are in trespass, and their removal from the subject property is authorized. Judgment is entered for the Government (Federal Defendants) on its trespass counterclaim. This action was (check one): ’ tried by a jury with Judge rendered a verdict. ’ tried by Judge was reached. presiding, and the jury has without a jury and the above decision on motions at ’ decided by Judge ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON ECF Nos. 231, 344, 433, and 439. Date: 7/9/2020 CLERK OF COURT SEAN F. McAVOY s/ Lee Reams (By) Deputy Clerk Lee Reams

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?