Grondal et al v. United States of America et al
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION - Judgment in favor of the Government (Federal Defendants) on its trespass counterclaim. (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.) (LTR, Case Administrator)
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Eastern District of Washington
FILED IN THE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
PAUL GRONDAL, a Washington resident,
MILL BAY MEMBERS ASSOCIATION, INC., et al.
Jul 09, 2020
SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK
Civil Action No. 2:09-cv-00018-RMP
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the plaintiff (name)
interest at the rate of
recover from the
the amount of
), which includes prejudgment
% per annum, along with costs.
%, plus post judgment interest at the rate of
’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
’ other: Defendants’ Motion and Memorandum Joining in the Federal Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment re Ejectment,
(ECF No. 344) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 433) is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion for
Summary Judgment (ECF No. 439) is DENIED. The Government’s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment re
Ejectment (ECF No. 231) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs are in trespass, and their removal from the subject property is
authorized. Judgment is entered for the Government (Federal Defendants) on its trespass counterclaim.
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury with Judge
rendered a verdict.
’ tried by Judge
presiding, and the jury has
without a jury and the above decision
on motions at
’ decided by Judge ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON
ECF Nos. 231, 344, 433, and 439.
CLERK OF COURT
SEAN F. McAVOY
s/ Lee Reams
(By) Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?