Grondal et al v. United States of America et al
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE with respect to Wapato Heritage's remaining crossclaims. (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.) (LTR, Case Administrator)
ECF No. 645
PageID.9369 Page 1 of 1
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FILED IN THE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Eastern District of Washington
PAUL GRONDAL, a Washington resident; MILL BAY MEMBERS
ASSOCIATION, INC., a Washington non-profit corporation,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
INTERIOR; BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS; FRANCIS ABRAHAM;
CATHERINE GARRISON; MAUREEN MARCELLAY, MIKE PALMER, also
known as Michael H. Palmer; JAMES ABRAHAM; NAOMI DICK; ANNIE
WAPATO; ENID MARCHAND; GARY REYES; PAULWAPATO, JR.; LYNN
BENSON; DARLENE HYLAND; RANDY MARCELLAY; FRANCIS REYES;
LYDIA W. ARMEECHER; MARY JO GARRISON; et al.
Jan 19, 2021
SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK
Civil Action No. 2:09-cv-00018-RMP
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the plaintiff (name)
recover from the
the amount of
), which includes prejudgment
% per annum, along with costs.
%, plus post judgment interest at the rate of
interest at the rate of
’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
The Federal Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 570) is GRANTED. Wapato Heritage’s remaining crossclaims are DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE; a) Wapato Heritage’s First Crossclaim, seeking declaratory relief, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; b) Wapato Heritage’s Fourth
Crossclaim for ejectment and/or wrongful detainer is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; c) Wapato Heritage’s Fifth Crossclaim seeking overpayment
under written leases is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; d) Wapato Heritage’s Sixth Crossclaim seeking damages for underpayment and failure to
collect is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; e) Wapato Heritage’s Seventh Crossclaim seeking partition of MA-8 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; f)
Since Wapato Heritage has failed to prevail on the aforementioned crossclaims, it is not entitled to attorney fees and costs as requested in crossclaim eight.
Accordingly, Wapato Heritage’s Eighth Crossclaim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury with Judge
rendered a verdict.
presiding, and the jury has
’ tried by Judge
’ decided by Judge
without a jury and the above decision
Rosanna Malouf Peterson
Federal Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 570).
CLERK OF COURT
SEAN F. McAVOY
s/ Lee Reams
(By) Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?