In RE: LLS America LLC (Kriegman v. Blea et al)
Filing
76
ORDER GRANTING 70 APPLICATION TO EXTEND JUDGMENT. Signed by Senior Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson. (SG, Case Administrator) (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.)
Case 2:12-cv-00479-RMP
ECF No. 76
filed 12/19/22
PageID.462 Page 1 of 4
1
2
FILED IN THE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
3
Dec 19, 2022
SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
6
7
8
9
10
11
In Re:
LLS AMERICA, LLC,
Debtor,
BRUCE P. KRIEGMAN, solely in his
capacity as the court-appointed
Chapter 11 Trustee for LLS America,
LLC,
12
13
14
NO: 2:12-CV-479-RMP
Bankruptcy Court No. 09-06194
Adv. Proc. No. 11-80294
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
TO EXTEND JUDGMENT
Plaintiff,
v.
ARLENE JOHANSON,
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
20
BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiff’s Motion ECF No. 70, and Declaration
of Bruce P. Kriegman in Support of said Motion, ECF No. 71. No objection has
been filed. Having reviewed the record and relevant law, the Court is fully
informed.
21
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO EXTEND JUDGMENT ~ 1
Case 2:12-cv-00479-RMP
1
ECF No. 76
filed 12/19/22
PageID.463 Page 2 of 4
On November 1, 2012, the Court entered a Default Judgment, ECF No. 33,
2
and Judgment in a Civil Action in favor of the Trustee against Defendant, ECF No.
3
34. The total judgment was CAD $25,989.53, plus USD $250.00, with interest
4
equal to the weekly average of one-year constant maturity (nominal) treasury yield
5
as published by the Federal Reserve System. ECF No. 34. The ten-year period for
6
execution upon the judgment expired on November 1, 2022. Fed. R. Civ. P. 69;
7
RCW 6.17.020(1).
8
9
Plaintiff requests that the judgment be extended for an additional ten (10)
years, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 69 and RCW 6.17.020(3). ECF No. 70 at 2. The
10
judgment remains wholly unsatisfied. ECF No. 71 at 3. The Court finds good cause
11
exists to extend the judgment for an additional 10 years.
12
According, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
13
14
15
16
1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Alter Judgment by Extending Judgment, ECF No. 70, is
GRANTED.
2. The Judgment previously entered in this matter, ECF No. 34, shall be
AMENDED as follows:
17
a. The Judgment is extended for ten (10) years from November 1, 2022.
18
b. Interest will continue to accrue at the rate of the weekly average of
19
one-year constant maturity (nominal) treasury yield as published by
20
the Federal Reserve System.
21
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO EXTEND JUDGMENT ~ 2
Case 2:12-cv-00479-RMP
ECF No. 76
filed 12/19/22
PageID.464 Page 3 of 4
c. Pursuant to RCW 6.17.020(3), 4.64.030(2)(a), the following shall be
1
2
included on the first page of the amended judgment:
3
SUMMARY OF EXTENDED JUDGMENT
4
Judgment Creditor:
5
6
7
8
Plaintiff Bruce P. Kriegman solely in his
capacity as the court-appointed Chapter 11
Trustee for LLS America, LLC and the
Liquidating Trustee under the Liquidating
Trust made pursuant to the Chapter 11
Trustee's and Official Committee of
Unsecured Creditor's Second Modified Plan
of Liquidation dated as of November 27,
2012
Attorney for Judgment Creditor:
Witherspoon Kelley
10
Judgment Debtor:
Arlene Johanson
11
Original Amount of Judgment:
12
13
Interest under Judgment:
(11/02/2012 – 10/14/2022)
(.18% for 3,634 days)
$ 25,989.53 CAD
$ 250.00 USD
$ 470.24 USD
14
Recoverable Costs – Application Fee: $
15
New Total Judgment:
$ 25,989.53 CAD
$ 1,122.24 USD
Interest Rate:
.18% per annum
9
16
17
18
19
20
402.00 USD
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
21
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO EXTEND JUDGMENT ~ 3
Case 2:12-cv-00479-RMP
1
ECF No. 76
Order and provide copies to counsel.
3
DATED December 19, 2022.
5
6
PageID.465 Page 4 of 4
IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Clerk is directed to enter this
2
4
filed 12/19/22
s/ Rosanna Malouf Peterson
ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON
Senior United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO EXTEND JUDGMENT ~ 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?