United States of America v. 26218 South Buttonwood Drive Sun Lakes Arizona

Filing 21

ORDER OF FORFEITURE OF SUBSTITUTE RES - granting 20 Motion for Forfeiture of Property. Signed by Senior Judge Lonny R. Suko. (CC, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
1 Michael C. Ormsby United States Attorney 2 Eastern District of Washington James A. Goeke 3 Assistant United States Attorney Post Office Box 1494 4 Spokane, WA 99210-1494 Telephone: (509) 353-2767 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) 26218 SOUTH BUTTONWOOD DRIVE, ) SUN LAKES, ARIZONA, TOGETHER ) WITH ALL APPURTENANCES, ) FIXTURES, ATTACHMENTS, AND ) IMPROVEMENTS THERETO AND ) THEREUPON, ) ) Defendant. ) 15 CV-12-0496-LRS Order of Forfeiture of Substitute Res Plaintiff, United States of America, filed a Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In 16 Rem on August 3, 2012, alleging that the Defendant property was subject to forfeiture 17 to the United States pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C). ECF No. 1. 18 19 The above court has jurisdiction over this matter by virtue of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1345 and 1355. Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1395. 20 The defendant real property is located at 26218 South Buttonwood Drive, Sun 21 Lakes, Arizona, and is legally described in the Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In 22 Rem. 23 According to Maricopa County Assessor real property records, Octotillo K, 24 LLC, is the owner of the real property. 25 On or about November 30, 2012, the United States Marshals Service posted a 26 Notice of Complaint for Forfeiture (ECF No. 9), and copies of the Verified Complaint 27 for Forfeiture In Rem (ECF No. 1), Order Reassigning Case (ECF No. 3), and the Lis 28 Pendens (ECF No. 4), upon the Defendant real property (ECF No. 10). Order of Forfeiture of Substitute Res 1 FoF Re Sub Res 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 On or about November 28, 2012, Ocotillo K, LLC, was served, via certified mail, return receipt requested, in care of Manager, Kimberly Jeffreys, and in care of Registered Agent, Elizabeth S. Ashley, Esq., with copies of the Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem (ECF No. 1), the Lis Pendens (ECF No. 4), the Order Reassigning Case (ECF No. 3), and the Notice of Complaint for Forfeiture. ECF Nos. 7 and 7-1. Based upon the direct notice service date, Ocotillo K, LLC’s, deadline to file a timely claim was January 2, 2013. On or about December 21, 2012, Ocotillo K, LLC, filed a verified claim signed by “Kim Jeffreys, Owner”. ECF No. 12. On or about January 11, 2013, the United States and Claimant, Ocotillo K, LLC, entered into a Stipulation Extending Time to Answer or Otherwise Move. ECF No. 14. On or about March 8, 2014, Ocotillo K, LLC, filed its Answer to Complaint. ECF No. 15. On or about July 29, 2014, the United States and Ocotillo K, LLC, by and through its Owner/Manager, Kimberly Jeffreys, entered into a settlement agreement and 14 stipulation for forfeiture (ECF No. 18), in accordance with her plea agreement filed in 15 United States v. Kimberly Jeffreys, 2:13-CR-12-RMP-2 (ECF No. 452 at 7 and 8), 16 filed herein on September 23, 2014, in which Kimberly Jeffreys agreed to provide 17 $125,000.00 substitute res in lieu of forfeiture of the Defendant real property. 18 On or about November 28, 2012, Gregory Jeffreys, was served, via certified 19 mail, return receipt requested, at his last known addresses, with copies of the Verified 20 Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem (ECF No. 1), the Lis Pendens (ECF No. 4), the Order 21 Reassigning Case (ECF No. 3), and the Notice of Complaint for Forfeiture. ECF Nos. 22 5 and 5-1. Based upon the direct notice service date, Gregory Jeffreys’s deadline to 23 file a timely claim was January 2, 2013. On or about December 31, 2012, Gregory 24 Jeffreys filed a Waiver, acknowledging receipt of notice; and, waiving, relinquishing 25 and giving up any right to the Defendant real property. ECF No. 13. On or about 26 February 3 and 6, and June 5, 2014, the United States and Gregory Jeffreys, by and 27 through his attorney, Mark Vovos, entered into a stipulation for forfeiture (ECF No. 28 17), in accordance with his plea agreement filed in United States v. Gregory D. Order of Forfeiture of Substitute Res 2 FoF Re Sub Res 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Jeffreys, 2:13-CR-12-RMP-1 (ECF No. 403 at 15 - 17), filed herein on September 23, 2014, in which Gregory Jeffreys stipulated and agreed to the forfeiture of any interest he has or may have in the Defendant real property. On or about August 12, 2014, the United States was notified by the United States Marshals Service in Arizona, that they had received a check in the amount of $125,000.00 in substitute res in lieu of forfeiture of the Defendant real property. It appearing to the Court that the United States and real property owner Ocotillo K, LLC/Kimberly Jeffreys agreed in the settlement agreement and stipulation filed herein to the forfeiture of $125,000.00 substitute res in lieu of forfeiture of the Defendant real property; It also appearing the Gregory Jeffreys waived and relinquished any interest he has or may have in the Defendant real property; It further appearing to the Court that the $125,000.00 in substitute res has been provided to the United States as agreed; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that the Plaintiffs’ Motion For Entry Of An Order Of Forfeiture Of Substitute Res, ECF No. 17 20, is GRANTED, and the $125,000.00 substitute res is hereby forfeited to the United 18 States; 19 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States Marshal’s Service shall 20 dispose of the $125,000.00 in accordance with law. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED this 25th day of September, 2014. s/Lonny R. Suko _____________________________ Lonny R. Suko Senior United States District Judge Presented by: Michael C. Ormsby United States Attorney s/James A. Goeke James A. Goeke Assistant United States Attorney Order of Forfeiture of Substitute Res 3 FoF Re Sub Res

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?