In Re LLS America LLC (Kriegman v. Perry et al) WAEB BK Adversary Proceeding No. 11-80293-PCW11
ORDER Denying 51 Motion to Dismiss Othelia Spare. Signed by Chief Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson. (CV, Case Administrator)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
LLS AMERICA, LLC,
Bankr. Case No. 09-06194-PCW11
BRUCE P. KRIEGMAN, solely in his
capacity as court-appointed Chapter 11
Trustee for LLS America, LLC,
Adv. Proc. No. 11-80293-PCW11
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
DISMISS OTHELIA SPARE
DAVID PERRY and OTHELIA
Defendant David Perry submitted a letter requesting the Court to dismiss his
daughter, Othelia Spare, from this case. ECF No. 51. As the Court has informed
Defendant Perry in the past, because he is not a licensed attorney who is admitted
to practice in this Court, he may not represent his daughter. See ECF No. 30.
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS OTHELIA SPARE ~ 1
Defendant Perry is incorrect that he may bring the motion on his own behalf due to
the emotional pressure that he suffers due to his daughter’s involvement this
If Defendant Spare was properly served under the requirements of Rule 4 of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, then Defendant Spare is subject to the
jurisdiction of this Court and may respond on her own behalf. Defendant Perry
may not assert that argument on her behalf. The Court reminds Defendant Perry
that he must follow the Federal and Local Rules and directs him in particular to
review Federal Rule of Procedure 4 and Local Rule 7.1.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss
Defendant Othelia Spare, ECF No. 51, is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
The District Court Executive is hereby directed to enter this Order and to
provide copies to counsel and to pro se defendants.
DATED this 6th day of March 2014.
s/ Rosanna Malouf Peterson
ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON
Chief United States District Court Judge
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS OTHELIA SPARE ~ 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?