Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 31

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 30 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Senior Judge Robert H. Whaley. (CC, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 5 6 7 DAWN MILLER, 8 Plaintiff, 9 vs. 10 11 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Civil No. 2:12-cv-03154-JPH ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 12 Defendant. 13 BEFORE THE COURT is the magistrate judge’s report, ECF No. 30, 14 recommending the Court grant the parties’ stipulated motion for remand. ECF No. 15 29. The parties have not consented to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction. 16 After consideration, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 17 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 30, is 18 19 adopted in its entirety. 20 21 2. The Commissioner’s final decision is reversed and remanded for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g). Upon remand to the 22 Commissioner of Social Security, the Appeals Council will remand this case to the 23 Page 1 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 1 Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to: (1) conduct a new hearing, further develop 2 3 the record and issue a new decision (2) reevaluate steps two and three of the 4 sequential evaluation process (3) reevaluate Plaintiff’s credibility pursuant to SSR 5 96-7p (4) reevaluate Plaintiff’s residual functional capacity pursuant to SSR 96- 6 8p, and (5) reevaluate steps four and five of the sequential evaluation process with 7 the assistance of a vocational expert, as necessary. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is directed to enter this 9 10 Order, and forward copies to the parties and Magistrate Judge Hutton. DATED this12th day of March, 2014. 11 12 s/Robert H. Whaley ROBERT H. WHALEY U.S. District Judge 13 14 15 Q:\RHW\aCIVIL\2012\dawnmiller.doc 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Page 2 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?