Silva et al v. Bodnar et al

Filing 105

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Rodgers Report and Recommendation ECF No. 104 . The parties stipulation of dismissal ECF No. 103 is GRANTED. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment ECF No. 82 is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiffs Complaint ECF No. 1 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The file is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Rice. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 9 JEFFREY R. McKEE, No. 12-CV-5102-JTR Plaintiff, 10 11 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION v. 12 13 KATHY BODNAR, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 BEFORE THE COURT is Magistrate Judge Rodgers’ December 6, 2013, 18 Report and Recommendation to grant the parties’ stipulation of dismissal. ECF 19 No. 104. Plaintiff appears pro se. Defendants are represented by Candie M. 20 Dibble and John C. Dittman. There being no objections to the Report and 21 Recommendation, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety 22 and dismisses this action with prejudice. 23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 24 25 1. The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Rodgers’ Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 104). 26 2. The parties’ stipulation of dismissal (ECF No. 103) is GRANTED. 27 3. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 82) is 28 DENIED AS MOOT. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 1 1 4. 2 PREJUDICE. 3 5. All hearings and other deadlines are STRICKEN. 4 6. This file shall be CLOSED. 5 6 Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED WITH IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk’s Office is directed to enter this Order and provide a copy to Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants. 7 8 DATED December 31, 2013. 9 10 11 THOMAS O. RICE United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?