Wallin v. Groom et al

Filing 7

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B).The Court finds that any appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith. Plaintiffs in forma pauperis status is REVOKED. The file is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Rice. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 7 JESSE D. WALLIN, SR., NO: 13-CV-0074-TOR Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE STEVE GROOM, et al., Defendants. 11 12 13 On June 27, 2013, Plaintiff was ordered to file, within 60 days, an Amended 14 Complaint or voluntarily dismiss the Complaint. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and 15 in forma pauperis. 16 Plaintiff was cautioned that his failure to amend or voluntarily dismiss 17 within 60 days would result in the dismissal of this case. Although granted the 18 opportunity to do so, Plaintiff has now failed to amend or voluntarily dismiss this 19 action. 20 /// ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE -- 1 1 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), “[a]n appeal may not be taken in forma 2 pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith.” The 3 good faith standard is an objective one, and good faith is demonstrated when an 4 individual “seeks appellate review of any issue not frivolous.” See Coppedge v. 5 United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962). For purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915, an 6 appeal is frivolous if it lacks any arguable basis in law or fact. Neitzke v. Williams, 7 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989). 8 9 The Court finds that any appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith and would lack any arguable basis in law or fact. Accordingly, the Court 10 hereby revokes Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status. 11 ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 12 13 1. Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B). 14 2. Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status is REVOKED. 15 The District Court Executive is directed to enter this Order, enter judgment 16 17 of dismissal without prejudice, forward a copy to Plaintiff, and CLOSE the file. DATED October 22, 2013. 18 19 THOMAS O. RICE United States District Judge 20 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE -- 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?