Barnhart v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company et al

Filing 70

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment ECF No. 61 is GRANTED. No remaining defendants have been timely identified nor served, so the action is DISMISSED. The file is CLOSED. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 7 JOY LEE BARNHART, No. 2:13-CV-0090-TOR Plaintiff, 8 9 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. 14 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY; HOMEWARD RESIDENTIAL f/k/a AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC.; WELLS FARGO BANK, NA as Trustee for Soundview Home Loan Trust 2007-OPT1, AssetBacked Certificates, Series 2007OPT1, and Doe Defendants 1-20, 15 Defendants. 10 11 12 13 16 BEFORE THE COURT is Defendant Homeward Residential and Defendant 17 Wells Fargo Bank’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 61). The Court has 18 reviewed the record and files herein, and is fully informed. For the reasons 19 discussed in ECF No. 60 (granting Defendant Fidelity’s Motion to Dismiss), the 20 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ~ 1 1 Court GRANTS Defendant Homeward Residential and Wells Fargo Banks’ 2 Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 61). 3 Additionally, Plaintiff has not timely identified nor served the Doe 4 defendants. See ECF No. 51 at 2. These placeholders are dismissed. 5 ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 61) is GRANTED. 2. No remaining defendants have been timely identified nor served, so the action is DISMISSED. The District Court Executive is directed to enter this Order and Judgment accordingly, furnish copies to counsel, and CLOSE the file. DATED April 18, 2017. 13 14 THOMAS O. RICE Chief United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ~ 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?