Barnhart v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company et al
Filing
70
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment ECF No. 61 is GRANTED. No remaining defendants have been timely identified nor served, so the action is DISMISSED. The file is CLOSED. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
7
JOY LEE BARNHART,
No. 2:13-CV-0090-TOR
Plaintiff,
8
9
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
v.
14
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE
INSURANCE COMPANY;
HOMEWARD RESIDENTIAL f/k/a
AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE
SERVICING, INC.; WELLS FARGO
BANK, NA as Trustee for Soundview
Home Loan Trust 2007-OPT1, AssetBacked Certificates, Series 2007OPT1, and Doe Defendants 1-20,
15
Defendants.
10
11
12
13
16
BEFORE THE COURT is Defendant Homeward Residential and Defendant
17
Wells Fargo Bank’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 61). The Court has
18
reviewed the record and files herein, and is fully informed. For the reasons
19
discussed in ECF No. 60 (granting Defendant Fidelity’s Motion to Dismiss), the
20
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ~ 1
1
Court GRANTS Defendant Homeward Residential and Wells Fargo Banks’
2
Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 61).
3
Additionally, Plaintiff has not timely identified nor served the Doe
4
defendants. See ECF No. 51 at 2. These placeholders are dismissed.
5
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 61) is
GRANTED.
2. No remaining defendants have been timely identified nor served, so the
action is DISMISSED.
The District Court Executive is directed to enter this Order and Judgment
accordingly, furnish copies to counsel, and CLOSE the file.
DATED April 18, 2017.
13
14
THOMAS O. RICE
Chief United States District Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ~ 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?