The Thompsons Film LLC v. Does 1-35

Filing 99

ORDER granting 96 Motion to Set Aside Default, re 86 Clerk's Order Re Default. The default entered against Defendant Wickenhagen on December 9, 2013 (ECF No. 86) is hereby VACATED. Plaintiffs claims against Defendant Wickenhagen are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice and without fees or costs to either party. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Rice. (BF, Judicial Assistant)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 7 THE THOMPSONS FILM, LLC, NO: 13-CV-0126-TOR 8 Plaintiff, 9 10 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT AND DISMISSING DEFENDANT MONTY WICKENHAGEN v. ROSS KAPPEN, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiff’s Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default 13 14 and for Dismissal Against Defendant Monty Wickenhagen (ECF No. 96). For 15 good cause shown, the motion is granted. The default entered against the late Ms. 16 Wickenhagen on December 9, 2013 (ECF No. 86) is hereby vacated. Plaintiff’s 17 claims against Defendant Wickenhagen are hereby dismissed with prejudice and 18 without fees or costs to either party. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). 19 // 20 // ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT MONTY WICKENHAGEN ~ 1 1 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The default entered against Defendant Wickenhagen on December 9, 2013 3 (ECF No. 86) is hereby VACATED. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant 4 Wickenhagen are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice and without fees or costs to 5 either party. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). 6 The District Court Executive is hereby directed to enter this Order, provide 7 copies to counsel, furnish copies to Defendants whose addresses are presently of 8 record, and TERMINATE Defendant Monty Wickenhagen. 9 DATED March 6, 2014. 10 11 THOMAS O. RICE United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT MONTY WICKENHAGEN ~ 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?