United States of America v. Nichols et al

Filing 45

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION. Judgment entered in favor of Plaintiff United States of America. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy)

Download PDF
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the_ Eastern District of Washington UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff v. ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 2:13-CV-0167-TOR DON O. NICHOLS and TERRY A. NICHOLS, etc., Defendant JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): ’ the plaintiff (name) defendant (name) recover from the the amount of ), which includes prejudgment % per annum, along with costs. dollars ($ %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of interest at the rate of ’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . ’ other: Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff, United States of America, and against Defendants Don Nichols and Terry Nichols, in the amount of $155,018.83, for the tax years 1999, 2001–2009, as of July 14, 2015, with interest accruing after that date as provided by law. See 26 U.S.C. § 6621; see also 28 U.S.C. § 1961(c)(1)(explaining that § 6621 applies in “any internal revenue tax case”). Default Judgment is entered against Defendant Last Day Trust which has no interest in the subject property. This action was (check one): ’ tried by a jury with Judge rendered a verdict. ’ tried by Judge was reached. ’ decided by Judge presiding, and the jury has without a jury and the above decision THOMAS O. RICE upon the parties' stipulated Motion to Approve Consent Judgment (ECF No. 41) and the Court's Order Granting Default Judgment against Last Day Trust. Date: September 25, 2015 CLERK OF COURT SEAN F. McAVOY s/ Linda L. Hansen (By) Deputy Clerk Linda L. Hansen

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?