Brown v. Adams et al

Filing 48

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Chief Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson. (CC, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 7 QUINTON P. BROWN, NO: 2:13-CV-192-RMP Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 LARRY L. ADAMS, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE 12 13 Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers filed a Report and Recommendation on 14 February 3, 2015. ECF No. 45. Judge Rodgers recommends that the Court grant 15 Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 24, and dismiss Plaintiff’s 16 First Amended Complaint, ECF No. 12, with prejudice. Plaintiff has not objected 17 to the Report and Recommendation. 18 19 Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the record, the Court adopts Judge Rodgers’s Report and Recommendation in its entirety. 20 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE ~ 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 45, is ADOPTED in its entirety. 2. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 24, is GRANTED. 3. Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, ECF No. 12, is DISMISSED with prejudice. The District Court Clerk is directed to enter this Order, provide copies to counsel and to Plaintiff, enter judgment accordingly, and close the file. DATED this 27th day of February 2015. 11 12 s/ Rosanna Malouf Peterson ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON Chief United States District Court Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE ~ 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?