Nickerson v. Eastern Washington Gateway Railroad
Filing
27
ORDER Granting 26 Joint Motion to Dismiss, With Prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge Lonny R. Suko. (PL, Case Administrator)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
WILLIAM J. SCHROEDER, WSBA No. 7942
GREGORY C. HESLER, WSBA No. 34217
WILLIAM C. SCHROEDER, WSBA No. 41986
PAINE HAMBLEN LLP
The Honorable Lonny R. Suko
717 West Sprague Avenue, Suite 1200
Spokane, Washington 99201-3505
Telephone: (509) 455-6000
Facsimile: (509) 838-0007
william.schroeder@painehamblen.com
greg.hesler@painehamblen.com
will.schroeder@painehamblen.com
9
10
Attorneys for Defendant
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
JOHN G. NICKERSON,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
EASTERN WASHINGTON GATEWAY )
RAILROAD, a Washington corporation, )
)
Defendant.
)
)
No. CV-13-375-LRS
ORDER GRANTING JOINT
MOTION TO DISMISS, WITH
PREJUDICE
22
23
24
25
THIS MATTER COMES BEFORE the Court on the Parties’ JOINT
MOTION TO DISMISS, WITH PREJUDICE, and the Court having considered the
request and finding that good cause exists,
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO
DISMISS, WITH PREJUDICE - 1
PAINE HAMBLEN LLP
717 WEST SPRAGUE AVENUE, SUITE 1200
SPOKANE, WA 99201
PHONE (509) 455-6000 FAX (509) 838-0007
1
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS,
WITH PREJUDICE, ECF No. 26, is hereby GRANTED. The above-captioned
3
4
action shall be dismissed, with prejudice, and without costs or attorney fees to any
5
Party. The District Court Executive is directed to close the file.
6
7
DATED this 7th day of April, 2015.
s/Lonny R. Suko
8
9
Lonny R. Suko
Senior U.S. District Court Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO
DISMISS, WITH PREJUDICE - 2
PAINE HAMBLEN LLP
717 WEST SPRAGUE AVENUE, SUITE 1200
SPOKANE, WA 99201
PHONE (509) 455-6000 FAX (509) 838-0007
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?