Nickerson v. Eastern Washington Gateway Railroad

Filing 27

ORDER Granting 26 Joint Motion to Dismiss, With Prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge Lonny R. Suko. (PL, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 WILLIAM J. SCHROEDER, WSBA No. 7942 GREGORY C. HESLER, WSBA No. 34217 WILLIAM C. SCHROEDER, WSBA No. 41986 PAINE HAMBLEN LLP The Honorable Lonny R. Suko 717 West Sprague Avenue, Suite 1200 Spokane, Washington 99201-3505 Telephone: (509) 455-6000 Facsimile: (509) 838-0007 william.schroeder@painehamblen.com greg.hesler@painehamblen.com will.schroeder@painehamblen.com 9 10 Attorneys for Defendant 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 JOHN G. NICKERSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) EASTERN WASHINGTON GATEWAY ) RAILROAD, a Washington corporation, ) ) Defendant. ) ) No. CV-13-375-LRS ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS, WITH PREJUDICE 22 23 24 25 THIS MATTER COMES BEFORE the Court on the Parties’ JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS, WITH PREJUDICE, and the Court having considered the request and finding that good cause exists, 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS, WITH PREJUDICE - 1 PAINE HAMBLEN LLP 717 WEST SPRAGUE AVENUE, SUITE 1200 SPOKANE, WA 99201 PHONE (509) 455-6000 FAX (509) 838-0007 1 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS, WITH PREJUDICE, ECF No. 26, is hereby GRANTED. The above-captioned 3 4 action shall be dismissed, with prejudice, and without costs or attorney fees to any 5 Party. The District Court Executive is directed to close the file. 6 7 DATED this 7th day of April, 2015. s/Lonny R. Suko 8 9 Lonny R. Suko Senior U.S. District Court Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS, WITH PREJUDICE - 2 PAINE HAMBLEN LLP 717 WEST SPRAGUE AVENUE, SUITE 1200 SPOKANE, WA 99201 PHONE (509) 455-6000 FAX (509) 838-0007

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?