Crull v. State of Washington Department of Social & Health Services et al
Filing
12
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Chief Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson. (CV, Case Administrator)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
6
LORI LEE CRULL,
NO. 13-00426-RMP
7
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
11
v.
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND
HEALTH SERVICES; KYLE BUNGE
and STEVE M. LOWE, in their official
and individual capacities,
Defendants
12
I.
13
STIPULATION
The parties to this action, through the undersigned counsel, stipulate to an
14
order of protection from the court as follows:
15
1.
Both parties have access to information and documents relating to
16
child care. Plaintiff from operating a former daycare business, known as Little
17
Lambs Learning Center and/or known by any other name, and Defendants and
18
other Department of Social and Health employees in the course of performing
19
their official duties. Pertinent files that both parties may have access to will
20
contain information of a confidential and privileged nature relating to minors and
21
third parties. This information may include but is not limited to: identification
22
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER
1
information, incidents or reports of child abuse or neglect, financial information,
2
records normally maintained by a daycare facility identifying information of a
3
personal or confidential nature, family information, and other information not
4
subject to public disclosure. These records need to be exchanged for the purposes
5
of discovery in this matter.
6
2.
The parties agree and the court orders that any and all documents
7
exchanged in discovery shall be treated as confidential and will not be made
8
accessible to anyone other than the parties, their counsel, and experts retained in
9
this litigation to review the documents.
10
3.
The parties agree that upon signing this stipulation, they will honor
11
the terms of the stipulation even before the court has an opportunity to sign and
12
enter the order.
13
4.
Since both parties would have access to the records relating to the
14
minors or other third parties who were in the care of the day care while it was
15
operated by plaintiff, the parties agree and the court orders that discovery can be
16
exchanged between the parties without redacting the identification or personal
17
information on third parties. This will facilitate discovery given the large volume
18
of records at issue.
19
5.
The parties agree and the court orders that if records exchanged in
20
discovery are to be disclosed to experts for the purposes of the litigation, then the
21
party retaining the expert will ensure that a confidentiality agreement is signed to
22
protect the interests of third parties or the information on the third parties is
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER
1
redacted, and the expert shall be made aware of and bound by the terms of this
2
order of protection.
3
6.
The parties agree and the court orders that counsel will have access
4
to reports of or information on reports of child abuse that related to the children in
5
the care of Plaintiff’s child care center. Plaintiff’s counsel agrees that the names
6
and identifying information of any reporter of child abuse, witness to child abuse,
7
victim of child abuse or person of interest in a child abuse report, will not be
8
disclosed to their client or anyone outside of legal counsel’s necessary personnel.
9
It is not anticipated that the identity of these persons is relevant to the pending
10
litigation, but if either party contends one of the reporters or witnesses of child
11
abuse becomes relevant in the pending litigation, the parties will attempt to reach
12
an agreement on any discovery relating to this issue or seek a further order from
13
the court as necessary.
14
7.
The parties agree and the court orders that any documents, records,
15
or electronic data or information disclosed in discovery in this matter will not be
16
filed with the court, except under seal, without the prior written permission and/or
17
consent of the other party.
18
8.
The parties agree and the court orders that any information and/or
19
documents produced in discovery shall not be further disseminated outside of the
20
parties, counsel and experts. The records will not be shown to lay witnesses or
21
any other individuals without written consent of the other party or further order
22
from the court.
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER
1
9.
The parties agree and the court orders that information and
2
documents, if used during depositions, must be redacted to prevent disclosure of
3
confidential/privileged information, and depositions shall be sealed as necessary
4
to prevent the disclosure of any identifying or personal information relating to
5
third parties.
6
10.
The parties agree and the court orders that the information and
7
documents provided in discovery, if filed with the Court, shall be filed under seal.
8
To the extent admission of these records into evidence at trial becomes necessary,
9
the parties will address the method of introduction to protect any and all
10
11
confidential and/or personal information with the court prior to trial.
11.
The parties agree and the court orders that the discovery documents
12
and any reproductions not necessary for preservation of litigation files will be
13
returned to the Office of the Attorney General at the conclusion of this litigation
14
for destruction or destroyed by the party in possession of the documents. Any
15
documents preserved to protect the integrity of litigation files will not be further
16
disseminated or used for any purpose other than one directly related to this
17
litigation.
18
12.
The parties agree and the court orders that the records disclosed in
19
discovery will not be used for any purposes other than as necessary in the course
20
of this litigation and consistent with the terms of this order of protection.
21
22
13.
The parties agree and the court orders that nothing in this order shall
prevent Defendants from making required disclosures of public records that may
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER
1
2
be required by law.
The Court finds that the information and/or documents described above may
3
be made confidential or conditionally privileged, but at the same time, the
4
information and/or documents are relevant to discovery in this matter. To
5
facilitate discovery and based upon the stipulated agreement of the parties, the
6
Court hereby orders the records shall be subject to this order of protection as set
7
out above.
8
9
10
The District Court Clerk is directed to enter this Order and provide copies to
counsel.
DATED this 27th day of March, 2014.
11
12
s/ Rosanna Malouf Peterson
ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON
Chief United States District Court Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?