United States of America v. Kegley et al
Filing
91
ORDER Denying 89 Mr. Kegley's Motion to Modify the Court's Summary-Judgment Order. Signed by Senior Judge Edward F. Shea. (CV, Case Administrator)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
4
5
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
No.
CV-13-5053-EFS
6
Plaintiff,
7
v.
8
9
ORDER DENYING MR. KEGLEY’S MOTION
TO MODIFY THE COURT’S SUMMARYJUDGMENT ORDER
RICHARD D. KEGLEY and WALLA WALLA
COUNTY,
10
Defendants.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Defendant Richard Kegley asks the Court to set aside the Court’s
Order Granting Summary Judgment in the United States’ favor as to Mr.
Kegley, ECF No. 86, because the rulings therein violate Mr. Kegley’s
individual rights under the U.S. Constitution. Mr. Kegley seeks relief
under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1) and (6). Rule 60(b)(1)
provides relief for mistakes of law, and Rule 60(b)(6) provides relief
under extraordinary circumstances. See Gonzales v. Crosby, 545 U.S. 524,
535 (2005). The Court determines relief is unavailable under Rule 60.
The arguments made by Mr. Kegley are the same arguments he has made
during the pendency of the lawsuit; arguments the Court has found
unsupported by statute and case law. The Court declines to modify or
set aside its prior order or the related judgment.
//
/
26
ORDER - 1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Mr. Kegley’s Motion to Modify
2
the Court’s Order of December 29, 2015, under Rule 60(b), ECF No. 89,
3
is DENIED.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
The Clerk’s Office is directed to enter this
Order and provide copies to counsel and Mr. Kegley.
DATED this
22nd _
day of January 2016.
7
s/Edward F. Shea
EDWARD F. SHEA
Senior United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Q:\EFS\Civil\2013\5053.reconsid.lc1.docx
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?