Zamora Jordan v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
Filing
90
ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION. Nationstars Motion for Reconsideration of the July 21, 2016 Summary Judgment Order ECF No. 82 is DENIED. The upcoming telephonic scheduling conference remains set. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
6
7
8
LAURA ZAMORA JORDAN, as her
separate estate, and on behalf of others
similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
9
10
11
NO: 2:14-CV-0175-TOR
ORDER DENYING
RECONSIDERATION
v.
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,
12
Defendant.
13
14
BEFORE THE COURT is Nationstar’s Motion for Reconsideration of July
15
21, 2016 Summary Judgment Order (ECF No. 82). This matter was submitted for
16
consideration without oral argument. The Court—having reviewed the briefing, the
17
record, and files therein—is fully informed.
18
On July 21, 2016, this Court ruled on the parties’ summary judgment
19
motions and lifted the stay in this matter, finding that the Washington Supreme
20
Court had issued its decision on the certified questions on July 7, 2016. ECF No.
ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION ~ 1
1
80. However, Defendant timely moved for reconsideration of the state court
2
decision, see RAP 12.4(b), and the Washington Supreme Court’s opinion was not
3
yet final, see RAP 12.5(c), 16.16(g). It is now final. On August 29, 2016, the
4
Supreme Court denied the motion for reconsideration. See ECF No. 89.
5
Accordingly, this Court denies Defendant’s motion as moot.
6
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED:
7
1. Nationstar’s Motion for Reconsideration of July 21, 2016 Summary
8
9
10
11
12
Judgment Order (ECF No. 82) is DENIED.
2. The upcoming telephonic scheduling conference remains set.
3. The District Court Executive is directed to enter this Order and provide
copies to counsel.
DATED September 2, 2016
13
14
THOMAS O. RICE
Chief United States District Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION ~ 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?