Royal Mint Company Inc v Dow AgroSciences LLC

Filing 14

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S RULE 12(b)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS - denying 6 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Stanley A. Bastian. (CC, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 7 8 ROYAL MINT COMPANY, INC., a NO. 2:14-cv-00233-SAB 9 Washington corporation, 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S RULE 12(b)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS 12 DOW AGROSCIENCES, LLC, a 13 Delaware limited liability company, Defendant. 14 15 16 Before the Court is the Defendant’s Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss, ECF 17 No. 6. In lieu of filing a response to Defendant’s motion to dismiss, Plaintiff filed 18 a First Amended Complain, ECF No. 11. Defendant subsequently filed an Answer 19 to Amended Complaint, ECF No. 12. 20 In light of these filings, Defendant’s motion to dismiss, in its current form, 21 is moot. Defendant is invited to file a new Rule 12(b)(6) motion if desired. 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S RULE 12(b)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS ~ 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 2 1. Defendant’s Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 6, is DENIED 3 as moot. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is hereby directed to 5 file this Order and provide copies to counsel. 6 DATED this 3rd day of September, 2014. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Stanley A. Bastian United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S RULE 12(b)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS ~ 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?