Kriegman v. Mirrow
Filing
44
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS DALE ELFORD AND EVELYN ELFORD granting 42 Motion to Dismiss. Party(ies) Dale Elford and Evelyn Elford terminated Signed by Chief Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson. (VR, Courtroom Deputy)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
6
7
In Re:
NO: 2:14-CV-268-RMP
8
LLS AMERICA, LLC,
Bankr. Case No. 09-06194-FPC11
Debtor,
9
Adv. Proc. No. 11-80297-FPC11
10
11
BRUCE P. KRIEGMAN, solely in his
capacity as court-appointed Chapter 11
Trustee for LLS America, LLC,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED
MOTION TO DISMISS
DEFENDANTS DALE ELFORD AND
EVELYN ELFORD
ANGELA MIRROW, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Before the Court is a Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Dale Elford and Evelyn
18
Elford as defendants, ECF No. 42, in accordance with the settlement agreement
19
reached by the parties.
20
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS
DALE ELFORD AND EVELYN ELFORD ~ 1
1
Having reviewed the motion and relevant filings, and being fully informed,
2
the Court finds that the terms of the dismissal are proper. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
3
41(a)(2). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
4
1. Plaintiff’s Stipulated Motion, ECF No. 42, is GRANTED.
5
2. Dale Elford and Evelyn Elford are dismissed as defendants in this matter
6
with prejudice and with each party to bear its own attorney fees and
7
costs.
8
9
10
11
The District Court Clerk is directed to enter this Order, to terminate Dale
Elford and Evelyn Elford as defendants in this case, and to provide copies of this
Order to counsel and to any pro se defendants.
DATED this 18th day of December 2014.
12
13
s/ Rosanna Malouf Peterson
ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON
Chief United States District Court Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS
DALE ELFORD AND EVELYN ELFORD ~ 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?