Lutz v. Colvin

Filing 13

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE SIX OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) granting ECF No. 11 . Case remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings. FILE ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers. (PH, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON STANLEY LEE LUTZ, 10 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 14 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, No. 2:14-CV-0317-JTR ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE SIX OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) 15 16 Defendant. 17 18 BEFORE THE COURT is Defendant’s Motion for Remand of the above- 19 captioned matter to the Commissioner for additional administrative proceedings, 20 including a de novo hearing, pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). ECF 21 No. 11. Attorney Dana Madsen represents Plaintiff; Special Assistant United 22 States Attorney Danielle R. Mroczek represents Defendant. The parties have 23 consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. ECF No. 8. 24 Plaintiff filed his complaint in this matter on September 26, 2014. ECF No. 25 1. Defendant has not yet filed an answer to the complaint. Pursuant to sentence 26 six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Court may remand the case to the Commissioner for 27 good cause shown before an answer is filed and retain jurisdiction. See Melkonyan 28 v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 98, 101 n. 2 (1991). Here, Defendant asserts that a ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO REMAND . . . - 1 1 remand is necessary because significant portions of the recording of the 2 administrative hearing held on June 13, 2013, are inaudible. ECF No. 12 ¶ 4. 3 Plaintiff’s counsel does not object to Defendant’s request for a sentence six 4 remand. ECF No. 12 ¶ 6. After considering the file and proposed order, the Court 5 finds good cause exists for the matter to be remanded for a de novo hearing and 6 new decision. Accordingly, 7 IT IS ORDERED: 8 1. 9 10 The Defendant’s Motion For Remand Pursuant to Sentence Six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), ECF No. 11, is GRANTED. 2. The above-captioned case is REVERSED and REMANDED to the 11 Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative proceedings, including 12 a de novo hearing, pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the 13 administrative law judge (ALJ) shall offer Plaintiff an opportunity for a new 14 hearing, further update the medical record as deemed necessary, and issue a new 15 decision. 16 3. The Court shall maintain jurisdiction of this action pursuant to 42 17 U.S.C. § 405(g). If the outcome is still unfavorable to Plaintiff, he may seek 18 judicial review by reinstating this case rather than by filing a new complaint. 19 20 21 The District Court Executive is directed to enter this Order, forward copies of the Order to counsel, and ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE THE FILE. DATED December 2, 2014. 22 23 24 _____________________________________ JOHN T. RODGERS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO REMAND . . . - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?