Lutz v. Colvin
Filing
13
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE SIX OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) granting ECF No. 11 . Case remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings. FILE ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers. (PH, Case Administrator)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
STANLEY LEE LUTZ,
10
11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
14
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Commissioner of Social Security,
No. 2:14-CV-0317-JTR
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO REMAND PURSUANT
TO SENTENCE SIX OF 42 U.S.C. §
405(g)
15
16
Defendant.
17
18
BEFORE THE COURT is Defendant’s Motion for Remand of the above-
19
captioned matter to the Commissioner for additional administrative proceedings,
20
including a de novo hearing, pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). ECF
21
No. 11. Attorney Dana Madsen represents Plaintiff; Special Assistant United
22
States Attorney Danielle R. Mroczek represents Defendant. The parties have
23
consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. ECF No. 8.
24
Plaintiff filed his complaint in this matter on September 26, 2014. ECF No.
25
1. Defendant has not yet filed an answer to the complaint. Pursuant to sentence
26
six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Court may remand the case to the Commissioner for
27
good cause shown before an answer is filed and retain jurisdiction. See Melkonyan
28
v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 98, 101 n. 2 (1991). Here, Defendant asserts that a
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO REMAND . . . - 1
1
remand is necessary because significant portions of the recording of the
2
administrative hearing held on June 13, 2013, are inaudible. ECF No. 12 ¶ 4.
3
Plaintiff’s counsel does not object to Defendant’s request for a sentence six
4
remand. ECF No. 12 ¶ 6. After considering the file and proposed order, the Court
5
finds good cause exists for the matter to be remanded for a de novo hearing and
6
new decision. Accordingly,
7
IT IS ORDERED:
8
1.
9
10
The Defendant’s Motion For Remand Pursuant to Sentence Six of 42
U.S.C. § 405(g), ECF No. 11, is GRANTED.
2.
The above-captioned case is REVERSED and REMANDED to the
11
Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative proceedings, including
12
a de novo hearing, pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the
13
administrative law judge (ALJ) shall offer Plaintiff an opportunity for a new
14
hearing, further update the medical record as deemed necessary, and issue a new
15
decision.
16
3.
The Court shall maintain jurisdiction of this action pursuant to 42
17
U.S.C. § 405(g). If the outcome is still unfavorable to Plaintiff, he may seek
18
judicial review by reinstating this case rather than by filing a new complaint.
19
20
21
The District Court Executive is directed to enter this Order, forward copies
of the Order to counsel, and ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE THE FILE.
DATED December 2, 2014.
22
23
24
_____________________________________
JOHN T. RODGERS
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO REMAND . . . - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?