Jerome, et ux v. United States of America

Filing 41

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT RANDALL GILLINGHAM DOING BUSINESS AS CASTLE CONSTRUCTION & MATERIALS - granting 40 Motion to Dismiss. Party(ies) Randall Gillingham terminated Signed by Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson. (VR, Courtroom Deputy)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 5 6 7 ROBERT JEROME and KAREN JEROME, husband and wife, NO: 2:14-CV-406-RMP 8 Plaintiffs, 9 v. 10 11 12 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and RANDALL GILLINGHAM, doing business as Castle Construction & Materials, ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT RANDALL GILLINGHAM DOING BUSINESS AS CASTLE CONSTRUCTION & MATERIALS Defendants. 14 15 BEFORE the Court is the parties’ Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Defendant 16 Randall Gillingham, ECF No. 40. Having reviewed the Motion and the record, the 17 Court finds good cause to dismiss Defendant Gillingham as requested. 18 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 19 1. The parties’ Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Defendant Randall 20 Gillingham, doing business as Castle Construction & Materials, ECF No. 21 40, is GRANTED. ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT RANDALL GILLINGHAM & MATERIALS ~ 1 1 2. All claims against Defendant Randall Gillingham, doing business as 2 Castle Construction & Materials, are dismissed with prejudice and 3 without costs to any party. 4 3. All claims against Defendant United States remain pending. 5 4. Any future captions shall be amended accordingly. 6 The District Court Clerk is directed to enter this Order, to terminate 7 Randall Gillingham, doing business as Castle Construction & Materials, and 8 to provide copies of this Order to counsel. 9 DATED this 16th day of August 2016. 10 11 12 s/ Rosanna Malouf Peterson ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT RANDALL GILLINGHAM & MATERIALS ~ 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?