Tabbert v. Howmedica Ostenonics Corp d/b/a Stryker Howmedica Osteonics

Filing 27

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER AND FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 502(d) ORDER, granting 24 Motion for Protective Order and adopting Agreed Protective Order [24-1]. Signed by Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr. (SK, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 3 4 THOMAS TABBERT, No. 2:15-CV-0039-SMJ 5 Plaintiff, 6 v. 7 8 9 HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP. d/b/a STRYKER HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS, a New Jersey corporation, ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER AND FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 502(d) ORDER Defendant. 10 11 Before the Court, without oral argument, is the parties’ Joint Motion for 12 Entry of Agreed Protective Order and Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) Order, 13 ECF No. 24. Pursuant to the Court’s Scheduling Conference Notice, ECF No. 15, 14 the parties conferred about the need for an order addressing Fed. R. Evid. 502(d) 15 as well as a confidentiality and protective order. The parties have drafted, and 16 request that the Court enter, a Stipulated Protective Order. Having reviewed the 17 pleadings and the file in this matter, the Court is fully informed and grants the 18 parties’ motion. 19 /// 20 // ORDER - 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 2 1. Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) Order, ECF No. 24, is GRANTED. 3 4 The parties’ Joint Motion for Entry of Agreed Protective Order and 2. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), the Court adopts 5 and enters the parties’ Agreed Protective Order, ECF No. 24-1. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk’s Office is directed to enter this Order 7 8 and provide copies to all counsel. DATED this 22nd day of June 2015. 9 _______________________________ SALVADOR MENDOZA, JR. United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Q:\SMJ\Civil\2015\Tabbert v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp-0039\ord.grant.protective.lc1.docx ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?