Tabbert v. Howmedica Ostenonics Corp d/b/a Stryker Howmedica Osteonics
Filing
380
ORDER DISMISSING CASE granting 379 Motion to Dismiss Signed by Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr. (JW, ECF Admin)
FILED IN THE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
1
Feb 02, 2018
2
SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
3
4
THOMAS TABBERT,
No. 2:15-CV-00039-SMJ
5
Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
6
v.
7
8
9
10
11
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS
CORPORATION d/b/a STRYKER
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS, a New
Jersey corporation,
Defendant.
________________________________
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS
CORPORATION,
12
Third-Party Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
15
MICROPORT ORTHOPEDICS, INC.,
and ROCKY MOUNTAIN MEDICAL
DISTRIBUTORS, INC.,
16
Third-Party Defendants.
17
18
On January 31, 2018, the parties filed a stipulated motion to dismiss, ECF
19
No. 379.
20
Procedure 41 and Local Rule 41.1, and stipulation of all parties, the parties moved
ORDER - 1
Consistent with the parties’ agreement and Federal Rule of Civil
1
for an order dismissing all claims, all counterclaims and all third-party claims.
2
Third-Party defendants MicroPort Orthopedics, Inc. and Rocky Mountain Medical
3
Distributors, Inc. filed a notice of settlement. ECF No. 348. Plaintiff Tabbert and
4
Defendant Howmedica Osteonics, Corporation filed a notice of settlement. ECF
5
No. 373.
6
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
7
1.
GRANTED.
8
9
The parties’ Stipulated Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 379, is
2.
All claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with all parties
to bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.
10
11
3.
All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.
12
4.
All hearings and other deadlines are STRICKEN.
13
5.
The Clerk’s Office is directed to CLOSE this file.
14
IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk’s Office is directed to enter this Order
15
16
and provide copies to all counsel.
DATED this 2nd day of February 2018.
17
__________________________
SALVADOR MENDOZA, JR.
United States District Judge
18
19
20
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?