Grellner v. Raabe et al
Filing
218
ORDER DISMISSING CASE, granting 217 Stipulated Motion to Dismiss. The stay in this matter is LIFTED. Case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr. (LR, Case Administrator)
1
FILED IN THE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
2
Aug 10, 2018
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SEAN F. M AVOY, CLERK
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
3
C
4
5
DANIEL GRELLNER, individually
and doing business as Venacore Inc.,
Plaintiff,
6
9
10
11
12
13
2:15-CV-00189-SMJ
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
v.
7
8
No.
RODNEY D. RAABE, individually and
on behalf of Sapheon Inc. and Sapheon
LLC; SAPHEON INC., a California
corporation; SAPHEON LLC, a
California limited liability company;
COVIDIEN HOLDING INC., a
Delaware corporation; COVIDIEN LP,
a Delaware limited partnership also
known as Tyco Healthcare Group LP;
and COVIDIEN SALES LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company also
known as Covidien LLC,
14
Defendants.
15
16
Before the Court is the parties’ Stipulated Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 217.
17
Consistent with the parties’ agreement and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
18
41(a)(2), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
19
1.
The stay in this matter is LIFTED.
20
Q:\SMJ\Civil\2015\Grellner v. Raabe et al-0189\stipulated.dismissal.docx
ORDER DISMISSING CASE - 1
1
2.
GRANTED.
2
3
The parties’ Stipulated Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 217, is
3.
All
claims
and
counterclaims
are
DISMISSED
WITH
4
PREJUDICE, with all parties to bear their own costs and attorney
5
fees.
6
4.
All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.
7
5.
All hearings and other deadlines are STRICKEN.
8
6.
The Clerk’s Office is directed to CLOSE this file.
9
IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk’s Office is directed to enter this Order and
10
11
provide copies to all counsel.
DATED this 10th day of August 2018.
12
13
SALVADOR MENDOZA, JR.
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
ORDER DISMISSING CASE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?