Center for Environmental Law and Policy et al v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al

Filing 76

JUDGMENT in favor of Plaintiff Center for Environmental Law and Policy against United States Fish and Wildlife Service, James W. Kurth. (PL, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the_ Eastern District of Washington CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY, Plaintiff v. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICES; and JAMES W. KURTH, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 2:15-CV-264-SMJ Defendant JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): ’ the plaintiff (name) defendant (name) recover from the the amount of ), which includes prejudgment % per annum, along with costs. dollars ($ %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of interest at the rate of ’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . ’ other: Plaintiff's Motion for Permanent Injunction and Entry of Judgment (ECF No. 49) is GRANTED. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff in accordance with the Order entered at ECF No. 75 and the Court's Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Denying Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 42). This action was (check one): ’ tried by a jury with Judge rendered a verdict. ’ tried by Judge was reached. ’ decided by Judge presiding, and the jury has without a jury and the above decision on a Motion for Permanent Injunction Salvador Mendoza, Jr. and Entry of Judgment (ECF No. 49) and the Court's Order Re Summary Judgment (ECF No. 42). Date: May 3, 2017 CLERK OF COURT SEAN F. McAVOY s/ Penny Lamb (By) Deputy Clerk Penny Lamb

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?