Hawkins v. Douglas County et al

Filing 41

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS CERTAIN DEFENDANTS. The parties Stipulated Motion for Dismissal of Defendants Steven M. Clem and John Does 15-25 with the Douglas County Deputy Prosecuting Attorneys Office ECF No. 38 is GRANTED. The above named Defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice and without an award of fees or costs to either party. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 7 EDWIN TROY HAWKINS, a married man, NO: 2:15-CV-0283-TOR 8 Plaintiff, 9 v. ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS CERTAIN DEFENDANTS 10 11 DOUGLAS COUNTY, a municipal corporation; et al.; Defendants. 12 13 14 BEFORE THE COURT is the parties’ Stipulated Motion for Dismissal of 15 Defendants Steven M. Clem and John Does 15-25 with the Douglas County 16 Deputy Prosecuting Attorney’s Office (ECF No. 38). The parties have stipulated 17 to the dismissal of Defendants Steven M. Clem and John and Jane Does 15-25 of 18 the Douglas County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office without prejudice and without 19 costs. 20 // ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS CERTAIN DEFENDANTS ~ 1 1 ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED: 2 1. The parties’ Stipulated Motion for Dismissal of Defendants Steven M. 3 Clem and John Does 15-25 with the Douglas County Deputy Prosecuting 4 Attorney’s Office (ECF No. 38) is GRANTED. The above named Defendants are 5 DISMISSED without prejudice and without an award of fees or costs to either 6 party. 7 2. The District Court Executive is directed to enter this Order, provide 8 copies to counsel, and TERMINATE Defendants Steven M. Clem and John and 9 Jane Does 15-25 of the Douglas County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office from the 10 11 docket. DATED July 20, 2016. 12 13 THOMAS O. RICE Chief United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS CERTAIN DEFENDANTS ~ 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?