Rosco et al v. Equifax Information Services et al
Filing
160
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 148 Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Grossinger KIA With Prejudice. Grossinger KIA is DISMISSED as a Defendant WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson. (PL, Case Administrator)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
6
7
RUSSELL D. ROSCO and BONNIE
R. ROSCO,
NO: 2:15-CV-325-RMP
8
Plaintiffs,
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
v.
EQUIFAX INFORMATION
SERVICES; AMERICREDIT;
CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE;
CONSUMER PORTFOLIO
SERVICES; COSTCO
WAREHOUSE; EXETER
FINANCIAL; EXPERIAN
INFORMATION SOLUTIONS;
FIRST BANK MORTGAGE;
FLAGSHIP CREDIT; GLOBAL
LENDING SERVICES, INC.;
GROSSINGER KIA; LAFONTAINE
TOYOTA; REGIONAL
ACCEPTANCE; ADVANTAGE
GROUP; TIDEWATER CREDIT; and
TRANSUNION LLS,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION TO DISMISS GROSSINGER
KIA WITH PREJUDICE
18
Defendants.
19
20
21
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION TO DISMISS GROSSINGER KIA WITH PREJUDICE ~ 1
1
BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Dismiss Grossinger KIA
2
With Prejudice, ECF No. 148. The Court has reviewed the motion, the record, and
3
is fully informed.
4
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
5
1. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Dismiss Grossinger KIA With Prejudice, ECF No.
6
148, is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
7
2. Grossinger KIA is DISMISSED as a defendant WITH PREJUDICE.
8
The District Court Clerk is directed to enter this Order, provide copies to
9
counsel and pro se Plaintiffs, and terminate Grossinger KIA as a defendant in
10
11
this case with prejudice.
DATED this 23rd day of June 2016.
12
13
s/ Rosanna Malouf Peterson
ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION TO DISMISS GROSSINGER KIA WITH PREJUDICE ~ 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?