Gardee v. Washington State Patrol et al
Filing
11
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Adopting 10 Report and Recommendations; granting 9 Plaintiff's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Complaint filed by Beau Charlton Gardee. Case Closed. Signed by Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr. (SK, Case Administrator)
1
FILED IN THE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Mar 25, 2016
SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK
FILED IN THE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
2
Mar 25, 2016
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
3
SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK
4
BEAU CHARLTON GARDEE,
No. 2:15-CV-0338-SMJ
5
Plaintiff,
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
6
v.
7
WASHINGTON STATE PATROL,
8
Defendants.
9
10
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Rodgers’s March 2, 2016 Report and
11
Recommendation, ECF No. 10, recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion to
12
Voluntarily Dismiss Complaint, ECF No. 9, be granted. No objections have been
13
filed.
14
After reviewing the Report and Recommendation and relevant authorities,
15
the Court finds the Magistrate Judge’s findings are correct. Therefore, the Court
16
adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.
17
//
18
//
19
//
20
//
ORDER - 1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
2
1.
entirety.
3
4
The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 10, is ADOPTED in its
2.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Complaint, ECF No. 9, is
GRANTED.
5
6
3.
Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
7
4.
The Clerk’s Office is directed to CLOSE this case.
8
IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk’s Office is directed to enter this Order
9
10
and provide copies to all counsel and Magistrate Judge Rodgers.
DATED this 25th day of March 2016.
11
SALVADOR MENDOZA, JR.
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Q:\SMJ\Civil\2015\Gardee v Washington State Patrol et al-0338\ord adopt R&R lc1 docx
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?