Gardee v. Washington State Patrol et al

Filing 11

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Adopting 10 Report and Recommendations; granting 9 Plaintiff's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Complaint filed by Beau Charlton Gardee. Case Closed. Signed by Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr. (SK, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
1 FILED IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Mar 25, 2016 SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK FILED IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 2 Mar 25, 2016 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 3 SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK 4 BEAU CHARLTON GARDEE, No. 2:15-CV-0338-SMJ 5 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 6 v. 7 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL, 8 Defendants. 9 10 Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Rodgers’s March 2, 2016 Report and 11 Recommendation, ECF No. 10, recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion to 12 Voluntarily Dismiss Complaint, ECF No. 9, be granted. No objections have been 13 filed. 14 After reviewing the Report and Recommendation and relevant authorities, 15 the Court finds the Magistrate Judge’s findings are correct. Therefore, the Court 16 adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. 17 // 18 // 19 // 20 // ORDER - 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 2 1. entirety. 3 4 The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 10, is ADOPTED in its 2. Plaintiff’s Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Complaint, ECF No. 9, is GRANTED. 5 6 3. Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 7 4. The Clerk’s Office is directed to CLOSE this case. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk’s Office is directed to enter this Order 9 10 and provide copies to all counsel and Magistrate Judge Rodgers. DATED this 25th day of March 2016. 11 SALVADOR MENDOZA, JR. United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Q:\SMJ\Civil\2015\Gardee v Washington State Patrol et al-0338\ord adopt R&R lc1 docx ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?