Meske v. Renzelman et al

Filing 192

ORDER DISMISSING CASE; order granting 191 Parties' Stipulated Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice and Without Costs. Case is Dismissed with Prejudice. File is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Mary K. Dimke. (SG, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
Case 2:15-cv-00359-MKD ECF No. 192 filed 05/31/22 PageID.1682 Page 1 of 2 1 2 FILED IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 3 May 31, 2022 SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 7 LILIANA M. MESKE, 8 9 10 11 12 Plaintiff, vs. No. 2:15-cv-00359-MKD ORDER DISMISSING CASE ECF No. 191 AMANDA RENZELMAN, individually and in her official capacity, DON W. ANDERSON, individually and in his official capacity, ASOTIN COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, and JOHN DOES 1-10, 13 Defendants. 14 15 Before the Court is the parties’ Stipulation for Order of Dismissal with 16 Prejudice and Without Costs, ECF No. 191. The parties stipulate to the entry of an 17 order dismissing the action with prejudice, with each party bearing its own costs 18 and fees. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the Court accepts the notice 19 of stipulation and dismisses the case. 20 ORDER - 1 Case 2:15-cv-00359-MKD 1 2 ECF No. 192 filed 05/31/22 PageID.1683 Page 2 of 2 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The parties’ Stipulation for Order of Dismissal with Prejudice and Without 3 Costs, ECF No. 191, is ACCEPTED. 4 2. The action is DISMISSED with prejudice, with all parties to bear their own 5 costs and attorney fees. 6 3. Any pending motions are DENIED as moot. 7 4. All hearings and other deadlines are STRICKEN. 8 5. The District Court Executive is directed to enter this Order, provide copies 9 to counsel, and CLOSE the file. 10 DATED May 31, 2022. 11 s/Mary K. Dimke MARY K. DIMKE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?