Hicks v. Bank of America NA et al
Filing
25
ORDER RE STIPULATED PRELIINARY INJUNCTION. Granting 18 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Stanley A Bastian. (SK, Case Administrator)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
9
10 ERNEST CLARK HICKS,
11
Plaintiff,
12
NO. 2:16-cv-00019-SAB
v.
13
14 BANK OF AMERICA N.A., Beneficiary,
QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORP. OF
15 WASHINGTON, Trustee, MORTGAGE
16 ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION
SYSTEMS, INC., Nominee
17
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER RE STIPULATED
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s First Motion for Preliminary Injunction, ECF
No. 18, and the parties’ Stipulation re First Motion for Preliminary Injunction.
ECF No. 19. Plaintiff maintains that Defendants acted in bad-faith and in violation
of several Washington state laws, the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act, and the
Home Affordable Modification Program. After Plaintiff filed his First Motion for
Preliminary Injunction, the parties filed a stipulation and proposed order agreeing
that the Trustee’s Sale currently scheduled for March 18, 2016, should be enjoined
while this action is pending or until further notice of the Court. The parties also
27
28
ORDER RE STIPULATED PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION # 1
1 agree Plaintiff should submit regular monthly payments of $2,024.63 into the
2 Court registry, as well as submit an initial payment on the date of this Order.
3
A party seeking a preliminary injunction must show (1) a likeliness to
4 succeed on the merits, (2) a likeliness of irreparable harm absent an injunction, (3)
5 the balance of equities is in its favor, and (4) an injunction is in the public interest.
6 Earth Island Institute v. Carlton, 626 F.3d 462, 469 (9th Cir. 2010) (citing Winter
7 v. Natural Res. Def. Council, 555 U.S. 7 (2008)). Alternatively, a preliminary
8 injunction may be granted with a showing of (1) a likeliness of irreparable harm
9 absent an injunction, (2) the existence of serious questions going to the merits of
10 the case, (3) the balance of hardship tilts sharply toward the plaintiff, and (4) an
11 injunction is in the public interest. Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Cottrell,
12 632 F.3d 1127, 1131-32 (9th Cir. 2011).
13
Having reviewed the pleadings, Plaintiff’s First Motion for Preliminary
14 Injunction, ECF No. 18, and the Stipulation, ECF No. 19, the Court is satisfied
15 that a preliminary injunction is appropriate.
16
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
17
1. Plaintiff’s First Motion for Preliminary Injunction, ECF No. 18, is
18
19
GRANTED.
2. The Court enjoins any attempt to conduct a Trustee’s Sale on any real
20
property of the Plaintiff, Ernest Clark Hicks, by any of the defendants or
21
their agents, or any other person having notice of this Order.
22
Specifically, the Court enjoins the sale of the real property located at
23
6005 Sunset Highway, Cashmere, WA 98815.
24
3. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c) and party stipulation,
25
Plaintiff shall deposit his monthly payment in the amount of $2,024.63
26
to the Court Clerk. The Plaintiff shall make such a payment on the first
27
day of each month and shall make an initial payment within TWO
28
working days of this Order. If the Clerk’s office is closed on the first
ORDER RE STIPULATED PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION # 2
1
day of the month, the payment shall be due on the next day the Clerk’s
2
office is open. Payment shall be made out to “U.S. District Court.” The
3
Clerk’s mailing address is:
4
District Court Clerk
United States District Court
PO Box 1493
Spokane, WA 99210
5
6
7
8
4.
This preliminary injunction will remain in effect until further Order of
9 this Court.
10
IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is hereby directed to
11 file this Order and provide copies to counsel.
12
DATED this 19th day of February 2016.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Stanley A. Bastian
United States District Judge
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER RE STIPULATED PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION # 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?