Key Tronic Corporation v. Smart Technologies ULC et al
Filing
136
ORDER granting 134 Motion for Protective Order. All Confidential Material produced during discovery in this matter shall be disclosed and protected as provided in ECF No. 134. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (BF, Paralegal)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
6
7
KEY TRONIC CORPORATION, a
Washington corporation,
No. 2:16-CV-0028-TOR
8
Plaintiff,
9
v.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION
FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION
SMART TECHNOLOGIES ULC, a
Canadian corporation; et al.,
Defendants.
BEFORE THE COURT is the parties’ Joint Motion for Protective Order
Regarding Confidential Information (ECF No. 134). The Court has reviewed the
completed record and files herein, and is fully informed.
The Court has reviewed the parties’ Stipulation and Proposed Protective
Order Regarding Confidential Information (ECF No. 134), which has been jointly
submitted by counsel for all parties in this action (except Smart Technologies
ULC, against whom all claims have been stayed). For good cause shown, the
Motion (ECF No. 134) is GRANTED.
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION ~ 1
1
2
3
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The parties’ Joint Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 134) is
GRANTED.
2. All Confidential Material (in document form or any other form) produced
5
during discovery in the above-captioned action, Case No. 2:16-CV-
6
00028-TOR, shall be disclosed and protected as provided in ECF No.
7
134.
8
9
10
The District Court Executive is directed to enter this Order and furnish
copies to counsel.
DATED January 25, 2017.
11
12
THOMAS O. RICE
Chief United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION ~ 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?