United States of America v. Rutherford et al
Filing
19
JUDGMENT in favor of United States of America against Louis G Rutherford (CV, Case Administrator)
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for th _
Eastern District of Washington
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff
v.
LOUIS G. RUTHERFORD, SALLY J. RUTHERFORD,
and CHELAN COUNTY ASSESSOR,
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 2:16-CV-0036-JLQ
Defendant
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
the plaintiff (name)
defendant (name)
recover from the
the amount of
), which includes prejudgment
% per annum, along with costs.
dollars ($
%, plus post judgment interest at the rate of
interest at the rate of
the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
in favor of the Government and against
the federal tax liens against the
✔ other: Judgment is enteredComplaint (ECF No. 1) and as describedLouis G. Rutherford foreclosingEntry of Judgment, Foreclosure
four properties set forth in the
in the Order re: Stipulation for
and Judicial Sale and Stay (ECF No. 18). These properties shall be sold at a judicial sale and the proceeds distributed in accordance
with the Court's Order (ECF No. 18). The United States has perfected lien interests in all property and all rights to property belonging
to Louis G. Rutherford, including the four properties identified in the Complaint (ECF No. 1), as of the date of each tax assessment
described in the Complaint (ECF No. 1), or acquired thereafter. No costs and attorneys fees are awarded to any party.
This action was (check one):
tried by a jury with Judge
rendered a verdict.
tried by Judge
was reached.
✔ decided by Judge
Date: 10/12/2016
presiding, and the jury has
without a jury and the above decision
Justin L. Quackenbush
CLERK OF COURT
SEAN F. McAVOY
s/ Cora Vargas
Deputy Clerk
Cora Vargas
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?