United States of America v. Goodwin et al

Filing 40

JUDGMENT in favor of United States of America against Christopher L Goodwin, Shelly A Goodwin, n/k/a Shelly A. Jamison, NUNC PRO TUNC 5/03/17. (PL, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the_ Eastern District of Washington UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff v. CHRISTOPHER L. GOODWIN, et al., ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 2:16-CV-44-RMP Defendant JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): ’ the plaintiff (name) defendant (name) recover from the the amount of ), which includes prejudgment % per annum, along with costs. dollars ($ %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of interest at the rate of ’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . ’ other: Judgment in rem is entered in favor of the United States and against Defendants Christopher L. Goodwin, Shelly A. Goodwin, n/k/a Shelly A. Jamison in the amount of $218,465.68 principal and interest accrued through date of judgment as calculated according to terms of the First Amended Complaint, ECF No. 13; plus interest from the date of judgment at the rate set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1961; plus filing fees allowed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(a)(2); plus court costs; and the costs and expenses of this action presently and in the future incurred for advertising, selling, and conveying the property. This action was (check one): ’ tried by a jury with Judge rendered a verdict. ’ tried by Judge was reached. ’ decided by Judge presiding, and the jury has without a jury and the above decision on a Motion for Rosanna Malouf Peterson Default Judgment (ECF No. 33). Date: May 3, 2017 Nunc Pro Tunc CLERK OF COURT SEAN F. McAVOY s/ Penny Lamb (By) Deputy Clerk Penny Lamb

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?