Johnson v. Colvin
Filing
25
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - GRANTED 20 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Carolyn W Colvin, 24 Report and Recommendations, DENIED 18 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Jamie Dianne Johnson. Signed by Senior Judge Fred Van Sickle. (VR, Courtroom Deputy)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
5 JAMIE DIANNE JOHNSON,
No. 2:16-CV-00057-FVS
6
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION TO DENY
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND
GRANT DEFENDANT’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
7
Plaintiff,
vs.
8 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
9 SECURITY,
10
ECF Nos. 18, 20, 24
Defendant.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
BEFORE THE COURT is the Report and Recommendation issued by
Magistrate Judge Mary K. Dimke on May 10, 2017, ECF No. 24, recommending
Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 18, be denied and Defendant’s
Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 20, be granted. No objection was filed.
After review, the Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation in its
entirety. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:
1.
The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 24, is ADOPTED in its
entirety.
2.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 18, is DENIED.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANT
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ~ 1
1
3.
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 20, is
2 GRANTED.
3
The District Court Executive is directed to file this Order and forward copies
4 to the parties. Judgment shall be entered for Defendant and the file shall be
5 CLOSED.
6
7
8
DATED May 30, 2017.
s/Fred Van Sickle
Fred Van Sickle
Senior United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANT
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ~ 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?