Cottle et al v. Associated Credit Service Inc

Filing 54

JUDGMENT in favor of Associated Credit Service Inc against James Miller, Jason Cottle, Saima Miller. (SK, Case Administrator)

Download PDF
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the_ Eastern District of Washington Jason Cottle; Saima Miller; and James Miller, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. Associated Credit Service Inc ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-00155-RMP Defendant JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): ’ the plaintiff (name) defendant (name) interest at the rate of recover from the the amount of ), which includes prejudgment % per annum, along with costs. dollars ($ %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of ’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . ’ other: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 25, GRANTED. Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 28, DENIED. Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification, ECF No. 36, DENIED AS MOOT. Defendant's Motion for Order Authorizing Defendant to Amend Answers, ECF No. 44, DENIED AS MOOT. Judgment in favor of Defendant. This action was (check one): ’ tried by a jury with Judge rendered a verdict. ’ tried by Judge was reached. presiding, and the jury has without a jury and the above decision on Defendant's motion for Summary ’ decided by Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson Judgment, ECF 25, GRANTED. Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 28, DENIED. Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification, ECF No. 36, DENIED AS MOOT. Defendant's Motion for Order Authorizing Defendant to Amend Answers, ECF No. 44, DENIED AS MOOT. Date: 6/23/17 CLERK OF COURT SEAN F. McAVOY s/ Shelly Koegler (By) Deputy Clerk Shelly Koegler

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?