Cottle et al v. Associated Credit Service Inc
Filing
54
JUDGMENT in favor of Associated Credit Service Inc against James Miller, Jason Cottle, Saima Miller. (SK, Case Administrator)
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the_
Eastern District of Washington
Jason Cottle; Saima Miller; and James Miller, on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff
v.
Associated Credit Service Inc
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-00155-RMP
Defendant
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the plaintiff (name)
defendant (name)
interest at the rate of
recover from the
the amount of
), which includes prejudgment
% per annum, along with costs.
dollars ($
%, plus post judgment interest at the rate of
’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
’ other: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 25, GRANTED.
Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 28, DENIED.
Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification, ECF No. 36, DENIED AS MOOT.
Defendant's Motion for Order Authorizing Defendant to Amend Answers, ECF No. 44, DENIED AS MOOT.
Judgment in favor of Defendant.
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury with Judge
rendered a verdict.
’ tried by Judge
was reached.
presiding, and the jury has
without a jury and the above decision
on Defendant's motion for Summary
’ decided by Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson
Judgment, ECF 25, GRANTED. Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 28, DENIED. Plaintiffs' Motion for
Class Certification, ECF No. 36, DENIED AS MOOT. Defendant's Motion for Order Authorizing
Defendant to Amend Answers, ECF No. 44, DENIED AS MOOT.
Date: 6/23/17
CLERK OF COURT
SEAN F. McAVOY
s/ Shelly Koegler
(By) Deputy Clerk
Shelly Koegler
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?