Wertman et al v. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc et al
Filing
23
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and the parties' motion, this matter is DISMISSED without prejudice and without costs to either party. The filed is closed. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (BF, Paralegal)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
6
7
8
9
10
FREDRICK DAVID WERTMAN
III, in his individual capacity and as
the Personal Representative of the
ESTATE OF JULIE JANE
WERTMAN; and the ESTATE OF
JULIE JANE WERTMAN,
NO: 2:16-CV-0193-TOR
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
11
Plaintiffs,
12
v.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE, INC., a
New Jersey corporation; ROCHE
DIABETES CARE INC., a Delaware
corporation; and DOE
DEFENDANTS 1-5,
Defendants.
BEFORE THE CO URT is the parties’ Stipulated Motion for Dismissal
(ECF No. 22). The parties represent that this matter should be dismissed without
20
ORDER OF DISMISSAL ~ 1
1
prejudice and without costs to either party pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
2
41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
3
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
4
1. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and the parties’ motion, this
5
6
7
8
9
10
matter is DISMISSED without prejudice and without costs to either party.
2. All pending motions are DENIED as moot and all hearing dates stricken
from the Court’s calendar.
The District Court Executive is hereby directed to enter this Order, furnish
copies to counsel, and CLOSE the file.
DATED May 31, 2017.
11
12
13
THOMAS O. RICE
Chief United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
ORDER OF DISMISSAL ~ 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?