Wertman et al v. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc et al

Filing 23

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and the parties' motion, this matter is DISMISSED without prejudice and without costs to either party. The filed is closed. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (BF, Paralegal)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 7 8 9 10 FREDRICK DAVID WERTMAN III, in his individual capacity and as the Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF JULIE JANE WERTMAN; and the ESTATE OF JULIE JANE WERTMAN, NO: 2:16-CV-0193-TOR ORDER OF DISMISSAL 11 Plaintiffs, 12 v. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE, INC., a New Jersey corporation; ROCHE DIABETES CARE INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOE DEFENDANTS 1-5, Defendants. BEFORE THE CO URT is the parties’ Stipulated Motion for Dismissal (ECF No. 22). The parties represent that this matter should be dismissed without 20 ORDER OF DISMISSAL ~ 1 1 prejudice and without costs to either party pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 2 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 3 ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 4 1. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and the parties’ motion, this 5 6 7 8 9 10 matter is DISMISSED without prejudice and without costs to either party. 2. All pending motions are DENIED as moot and all hearing dates stricken from the Court’s calendar. The District Court Executive is hereby directed to enter this Order, furnish copies to counsel, and CLOSE the file. DATED May 31, 2017. 11 12 13 THOMAS O. RICE Chief United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ORDER OF DISMISSAL ~ 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?