USA v. Horst
Filing
13
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE in favor of United States of America against Joy Marie Horst nka Joy Marie Zimbelman. (TR, Case Administrator)
1
FILED IN THE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
2
Jan 04, 2017
3
SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
6
7
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
NO: 2:16-CV-212-RMP
Plaintiff,
8
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
v.
9
10
JOY MARIE HORST, n/k/a JOY
MARIE ZIMBELMAN,
Defendant.
11
12
DECISION BY THE COURT:
13
This action came before the Court, without oral argument and a decision has
14
been rendered.
15
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
16
Plaintiff the United States of America is awarded judgment against
17
Defendant Joy Marie Zimbelman (formerly known as Joy Marie Horst) in the
18
amount of $166,119.38 ($133,831.89 principal and $32,286.99 interest accrued
19
through November 14, 2016); plus interest to accrue at the rate of $19.2498 per
20
day from and after November 14, 2016, to the date of judgment; plus interest from
21
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE ~ 1
1
the date of judgment at the legal rate until paid in full, for costs of suit, including
2
the filing fee allowed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(a)(2), and other proper relief.
3
1.
The debt upon which judgment is based is secured and perfected by
4
the following:
a. A mortgage recorded April 13, 2007, under File No. 1212779, Official
5
6
Records of Grant County, Washington. ECF No. 3-1 at pp. 9-14.
7
b. A security agreement dated February 23, 2007, describing a mobile
8
home, executed by Defendant, ECF No. 3-1 at pp.15-20, which was
9
perfected by United States of America acting through the USDA,
10
Farm Service Agency being listed on the certificate of title, ECF No.
11
3-1 at p. 21.
12
13
2.
The foregoing mortgage and security agreement cover the following
described property situated in Grant County, State of Washington:
14
a. The NE quarter of Section 29, Township 22 N, Range 28 E.W.M
15
situated in Grant County, Washington; Assessor’s Tax Parcel
16
Number: 171291001.
b. Fleetwood, 14X66, Single 1977 Broadmore Mobile Home, VIN
17
T1DFL2X713131003.
18
19
3.
Said mortgage and security agreement, which constitute first and prior
20
liens upon the property described above, are hereby foreclosed, and Defendant Joy
21
Marie Zimbelman, and all persons claiming by, through, or under them, are forever
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE ~ 2
1
barred and foreclosed from asserting any right, title, or interest in and to said
2
property, except to the extent that such defendant has rights of redemption under
3
Wash. Rev. Code chapter 6.23 or excess funds under Wash. Rev. Code chapter
4
6.21. The redemption period shall be 12 months.
5
4.
After the 10-day automatic stay of proceedings to enforce a judgment,
6
Plaintiff may present a praecipe for an order of sale to the clerk. See Fed. R. Civ.
7
P. 62(a) & (f) (nothing 14-day stay unless otherwise under state law for a judgment
8
on a lien); Wash. CR 62(a) (10-day stay); see also 18 Wash. Prac., Real Estate §
9
19.12 (2d ed.) (describing the enforcement process). The order of sale shall
10
provide that the United States Marshal for the Eastern District of Washington is
11
commanded to levy upon, seize, take into execution and sell, or deliver possession
12
thereof, according to law, and without appraisement, the above-described real
13
property, or so much thereof as may be necessary to satisfy the Judgment, interest
14
and costs, upon giving notice prescribed by law, and make return of writ within
15
sixty days from date hereof. Upon issuance of the order of sale, said property may
16
be ordered sold in the manner provided by law with any party to this suit may
17
become a purchaser at such sale and with the proceeds of such sale to be applied
18
first to the expenses thereof, and then in satisfaction of the sums adjudged to be
19
due plaintiff herein.
20
21
5.
Under Wash. Rev. Code § 61.12.070, the Court directs in this decree
of foreclosure “that the balance due on the mortgage and costs which may remain
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE ~ 3
1
unsatisfied after the sale of the mortgaged premises, shall be satisfied from any
2
property of the mortgage debtor . . . ..” Accordingly, if any deficiency remains
3
after application of the proceeds of the sale pursuant to the Judgment, execution
4
shall be issued for said deficiency against defendant and enforced against any other
5
property of any defendant not exempt from execution.
6
DATED January 4, 2017.
SEAN F. McAVOY
Clerk of Court
7
8
By:
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE ~ 4
s/Tonia Ramirez
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?